Bone Marrow FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma Revisited: Do Imaging and Pathology Match?
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To directly compare visual and quantitative (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to bone marrow biopsy (BMB) findings in the right posterior iliac crest in patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma in whom FDG-PET/CT was performed before BMB of the right posterior iliac crest. The right posterior iliac crest was assessed for bone marrow involvement, both visually and semi-quantitatively [using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measurements]. BMB of right the posterior iliac crest was used as reference standard.
Results: BMB of the right posterior iliac crest was positive in 5 (19.2 %) of 26 patients. There was full agreement between visual FDG-PET/CT and BMB findings in the right posterior iliac crest (i.e. no false-positive or false-negative FDG-PET/CT findings). Accordingly, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of visual FDG-PET/CT assessment for the detection of bone marrow involvement in the right posterior iliac crest were 100 % (5/5) (95 % CI 51.1-100 %), 100 % (21/21) (95 % CI 81.8-100 %), 100 % (5/5) (95 % CI 51.1-100 %), and 100 % (21/21) (95 % CI 81.8-100 %), respectively. SUVmax of BMB-positive cases (mean ± SD: 3.4 ± 0.85) was nearly significantly higher (P = 0.052) than that of BMB-negative cases (mean ± SD 2.7 ± 0.63).
Conclusion: This histopathological correlation study confirms the very high diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma, and supports the substitution of BMB with FDG-PET/CT in this setting.
Chiang M, Wang J, Lin W, Yen R, Huang J, Lu C Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):513.
PMID: 37964395 PMC: 10647177. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01456-1.
Imaging for diagnosis, staging and response assessment of Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McCarten K, Nadel H, Shulkin B, Cho S Pediatr Radiol. 2019; 49(11):1545-1564.
PMID: 31620854 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04529-8.
Li H, Xu C, Xin B, Zheng C, Zhao Y, Hao K Theranostics. 2019; 9(16):4730-4739.
PMID: 31367253 PMC: 6643435. DOI: 10.7150/thno.33841.
Cerci J, Bogoni M, Buccheri V, Etchebehere E, da Silveira T, Baiocchi O Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2018; 40(3):245-249.
PMID: 30128433 PMC: 6098181. DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2018.03.002.
Oner A, Surer Budak E, Aydin F, Salim O, Yucel O, Akkaya B Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2017; 26(2):69-75.
PMID: 28613199 PMC: 5472089. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.54376.