» Articles » PMID: 25347737

The Impact of Osteoblastic Differentiation on Osteosarcomagenesis in the Mouse

Overview
Journal Oncogene
Date 2014 Oct 28
PMID 25347737
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteosarcomas remain an enigmatic group of malignancies that share in common the presence of transformed cells producing osteoid matrix, even if these cells comprise a minority of the tumor volume. The differentiation state of osteosarcomas has therefore become a topic of interest and challenge to those who study this disease. In order to test how the cell of origin contributes to the final state of differentiation in the transformed cells, we compared the relative tumorigenicity of Cre-LoxP conditional disruption of the cell cycle checkpoint tumor-suppressor genes Trp53 and Rb1 using Prx1-Cre, Collagen-1α1-Cre and Osteocalcin-Cre to transform undifferentiated mesenchyme, preosteoblasts and mature osteoblasts, respectively. The Prx1 and Col1α1 lineages developed tumors with nearly complete penetrance, as anticipated. Osteosarcomas also developed in 44% of Oc-Cre;Rb1(fl/fl);Trp53(fl/fl) mice. We confirmed using 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine click chemistry that the Oc-Cre lineage includes very few actively cycling cells. By assessing radiographic mineralization and histological osteoid production, the differentiation state of tumors did not correlate with the differentiation state of the lineage of origin. Some of the osteocalcin-lineage-derived osteosarcomas were among the least osteoblastic. Osteocalcin immunohistochemistry in tumors correlated well with the expression of DNA methyl transferases, suggesting that silencing of these epigenetic regulators may influence the final differentiation state of an osteosarcoma. Transformation of differentiated, minimally proliferative osteoblasts is possible but may require such an epigenetic reprogramming that the tumors no longer resemble their differentiated origins.

Citing Articles

PRRX1-TOP2A interaction is a malignancy-promoting factor in human malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours.

Takihira S, Yamada D, Osone T, Takao T, Sakaguchi M, Hakozaki M Br J Cancer. 2024; 130(9):1493-1504.

PMID: 38448751 PMC: 11058259. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02632-8.


Multi-Anticancer Activities of Phytoestrogens in Human Osteosarcoma.

Cimmino A, Fasciglione G, Gioia M, Marini S, Ciaccio C Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).

PMID: 37686148 PMC: 10487502. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713344.


Cellular and Genetic Background of Osteosarcoma.

Urlic I, Jovicic M, Ostojic K, Ivkovic A Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023; 45(5):4344-4358.

PMID: 37232745 PMC: 10217763. DOI: 10.3390/cimb45050276.


Cellular dynamics of distinct skeletal cells and the development of osteosarcoma.

Otani S, Ohnuma M, Ito K, Matsushita Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1181204.

PMID: 37229448 PMC: 10203529. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1181204.


Mesenchymal loss of p53 alters stem cell capacity and models human soft tissue sarcoma traits.

Sorimachi Y, Kobayashi H, Shiozawa Y, Koide S, Nakato R, Shimizu Y Stem Cell Reports. 2023; 18(5):1211-1226.

PMID: 37059101 PMC: 10202654. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.03.009.


References
1.
Thomas D, Carty S, Piscopo D, Lee J, Wang W, Forrester W . The retinoblastoma protein acts as a transcriptional coactivator required for osteogenic differentiation. Mol Cell. 2001; 8(2):303-16. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00327-6. View

2.
Weiss A, Khoury J, Hoffer F, Wu J, Billups C, Heck R . Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's experience. Cancer. 2007; 109(8):1627-37. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22574. View

3.
Ragland B, Bell W, Lopez R, Siegal G . Cytogenetics and molecular biology of osteosarcoma. Lab Invest. 2002; 82(4):365-73. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3780431. View

4.
Haydon R, Zhou L, Feng T, Breyer B, Cheng H, Jiang W . Nuclear receptor agonists as potential differentiation therapy agents for human osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8(5):1288-94. PMC: 4527755. View

5.
Dacquin R, Starbuck M, Schinke T, Karsenty G . Mouse alpha1(I)-collagen promoter is the best known promoter to drive efficient Cre recombinase expression in osteoblast. Dev Dyn. 2002; 224(2):245-51. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.10100. View