Case-based Learning and Simulation: Useful Tools to Enhance Nurses' Education? Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To compare skills acquired by undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a medical-surgical course. To compare skills demonstrated by students with no previous clinical practice (undergraduates) and nurses with clinical experience enrolled in continuing professional education (CPE).
Design: In a nonrandomized clinical trial, 101 undergraduates enrolled in the "Adult Patients 1" course were assigned to the traditional lecture and discussion (n = 66) or lecture and discussion plus case-based learning (n = 35) arm of the study; 59 CPE nurses constituted a comparison group to assess the effects of previous clinical experience on learning outcomes.
Methods: Scores on an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), using a human patient simulator and cases validated by the National League for Nursing, were compared for the undergraduate control and intervention groups, and for CPE nurses (Student's t test).
Findings: Controls scored lower than the intervention group on patient assessment (6.3 ± 2.3 vs 7.5 ± 1.4, p = .04, mean difference, -1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.4 to -0.03]) but the intervention group did not differ from CPE nurses (7.5 ± 1.4 vs 8.8 ± 1.5, p = .06, mean difference, -1.3 [95% CI -2.6 to 0.04]). The CPE nurses committed more "rules-based errors" than did undergraduates, specifically patient identifications (77.2% vs 55%, p = .7) and checking allergies before administering medication (68.2% vs 60%, p = .1).
Conclusions: The intervention group developed better patient assessment skills than the control group. Case-based learning helps to standardize the process, which can contribute to quality and consistency in practice: It is essential to correctly identify a problem in order to treat it. Clinical experience of CPE nurses was not associated with better adherence to safety protocols.
Clinical Relevance: Case-based learning improves the patient assessment skills of undergraduate nursing students, thereby preparing them for clinical practice.
Shahzeydi A, Abazari P, Gorji-Varnosfaderani F, Ashouri E, Abolhassani S, Sabohi F BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):621.
PMID: 39237916 PMC: 11378630. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02233-z.
Kronemann B, Joson-Teichert E, Michiels-Corsten M, Bosner S, Groth J BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):306.
PMID: 39148026 PMC: 11325750. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02533-y.
Choi H, Tak S, Lee D BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):454.
PMID: 38041090 PMC: 10693023. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01621-1.
Diaz-Rodriguez L, Vargas-Roman K, Diaz-Rodriguez M, Sanchez-Garcia J, Linan-Gonzalez A, Rodriguez-Blanque R J Clin Med. 2022; 11(10).
PMID: 35628898 PMC: 9143142. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102771.
A scoping review of alternative methods of delivering ethics education in nursing.
Tanaka M, Tezuka S Nurs Open. 2021; 9(6):2572-2585.
PMID: 34255926 PMC: 9584469. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.987.