Comparative Analysis of Osteotomy Accuracy Between the Conventional and Devised Technique Using a Protective Cutting System in Medial Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is associated with potential intraoperative problems. For prevention of these problems, we thought that some surgical improvements were required and devised a protective cutting system (PCS). The purposes of this study were (1) to test our devised protective cutting system and (2) compare its accuracy in osteotomy to that of a conventional technique.
Materials And Methods: A comparative study was performed with 19 patients who underwent OWHTO with PCS (group I) and 16 patients who underwent OWHTO using a conventional technique (group II). For the evaluation of osteotomy accuracy, osteotomy lines of the anterior and posterior cortex were analyzed in the 3D surface models [Total (T), Osteotomy (O), Ratio (O/T), Effective osteotomy (E), Deviation direction (DD), and length (DL)]. Analysis of changes of the medial and lateral tibial slope was performed independently, and intraoperative complications were also analyzed.
Results: In the osteotomy line of the anterior aspect, O-anterior and Ratio (O- and T-anterior) showed statistical significance, and a larger osteotomy was observed in group II (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). In the osteotomy line of the posterior aspect, Ratio (O- and T-posterior) and E-posterior showed statistical significance (p = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). In the comparison between the change of the medial and lateral tibial slope, statistical significance was observed in both groups, and the medial tibial slope showed a larger increase than that of the lateral side (p = < 0.01 and <0.01, respectively). There were more intraoperative complications such as fracture and deviation of the osteotomy plane in group II, and this was more prominent at the posterior aspect.
Conclusions: OWHTO with PCS could improve the accuracy of osteotomies, especially those of the posterior cortex of the proximal tibia, thus resulting in a reduction of intraoperative complications.
Mahmoud H, Farhan A, Abdelwahab A, Elshaer A, Mahmoud M, Fahmy F J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):142.
PMID: 39910661 PMC: 11800602. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05524-6.
Cho J, Nam H, Park S, Ho J, Lee Y Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(12):5652-5662.
PMID: 37875585 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07611-9.
Gao F, Yang X, Wang C, Su S, Qi J, Li Z Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:1378042.
PMID: 36467884 PMC: 9711981. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1378042.
Park S, Kim J, Jeong H, Shim S, Park S, Kim J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 31(4):1571-1582.
PMID: 35680679 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07009-z.
Liu G, Liu S, Zhu C, Li J, Li J, Jia G J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):169.
PMID: 35303890 PMC: 8932241. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03057-w.