» Articles » PMID: 25341954

Metabolic Factors Accelerate Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence

Abstract

Background: Metabolic factors have been reported to increase the prevalence of colorectal adenomas, however, whether metabolic factors might also accelerate the recurrence after removal of adenomas has not yet been discussed. In this retrospective multicenter study, we clarified the risk factors for adenoma recurrence focusing on metabolic factors.

Methods: We analyzed the medical records of 43,195 patients who had undergone colonoscopy between January 2005 and December 2011 at 5 hospitals in Japan. Of these, the data of 1111 patients who had undergone removal of adenomas at the first screening colonoscopy, and then been followed up by colonoscopy 1 year and 2 years later were analyzed.

Results: The following 8 factors were demonstrated with a multivariate analysis as being associated with colorectal adenomas recurrence: for adenoma-related factors, 5 factors (villous features, grade of dysplasia, location and size of the largest removed adenoma, and number of the removed adenomas) were identified; for metabolic factors and other factors, 3 factors (age, body mass index (BMI), and fasting blood glucose (FBG)) were identified. A risk score (0-10 points) was developed based on these 8 factors. The risk of adenoma recurrence increased as the risk score increased. When the risk score was ≥3 (3-10) points, the odds ratio relative to <3 (0-2) points was 7.07 (95% CIs 5.30-9.43).

Conclusions: In addition to adenoma-related factors (villous features, grade of dysplasia, location, size and number), 3 factors (age, BMI and FBG) were demonstrated to influence the recurrence rate of colorectal adenoma. When the risk score was ≥3, the risk of recurrence was significantly elevated.

Citing Articles

Overweight and obesity are associated with colorectal neoplasia in an Australian outpatient population.

Kumar R, Brown A, Okano S, Simms L, Lord A, OSullivan T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23501.

PMID: 39379529 PMC: 11461741. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74042-y.


The Relationship Between Serum Lipids and the Formation of Colorectal Polyps.

Duzkoylu Y, Demircioglu M, Kilavuz H, Sari S Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e57511.

PMID: 38706995 PMC: 11066730. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57511.


A new nomogram use neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the recurrence of colorectal adenoma.

Dai Y, Feng Q, Huang J J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023; 14(4):1898-1899.

PMID: 37720455 PMC: 10502536. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-135.


Development and validation of a nomogram based on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting recurrence of colorectal adenoma.

He Q, Du S, Wang X, Liu J, Xu X, Liu W J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022; 13(5):2269-2281.

PMID: 36388694 PMC: 9660085. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-410.


Elevated serum triglyceride predicts recurrence of colorectal polyps in patients with advanced adenomas.

Liu B, Wen P, Gu X, Weng R, Liu S Lipids Health Dis. 2020; 19(1):211.

PMID: 32967679 PMC: 7513493. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01388-3.


References
1.
. [Definition and the diagnostic standard for metabolic syndrome--Committee to Evaluate Diagnostic Standards for Metabolic Syndrome]. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi. 2005; 94(4):794-809. View

2.
Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers A, Kliewer E, Mahmud S, Bernstein C . The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139(4):1128-37. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.052. View

3.
. Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2013; 37 Suppl 1:S5-13. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-S005. View

4.
Trayhurn P, Beattie J . Physiological role of adipose tissue: white adipose tissue as an endocrine and secretory organ. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001; 60(3):329-39. DOI: 10.1079/pns200194. View

5.
Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Kawabe T . Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut. 2004; 53(4):568-72. PMC: 1774009. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.026112. View