» Articles » PMID: 25341649

Face Features and Face Configurations Both Contribute to Visual Crowding

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2014 Oct 25
PMID 25341649
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Crowding refers to the inability to recognize an object in peripheral vision when other objects are presented nearby (Whitney & Levi Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 160-168, 2011). A popular explanation of crowding is that features of the target and flankers are combined inappropriately when they are located within an integration field, thus impairing target recognition (Pelli, Palomares, & Majaj Journal of Vision, 4(12), 12:1136-1169, 2004). However, it remains unclear which features of the target and flankers are combined inappropriately to cause crowding (Levi Vision Research, 48, 635-654, 2008). For example, in a complex stimulus (e.g., a face), to what extent does crowding result from the integration of features at a part-based level or at the level of global processing of the configural appearance? In this study, we used a face categorization task and different types of flankers to examine how much the magnitude of visual crowding depends on the similarity of face parts or of global configurations. We created flankers with face-like features (e.g., the eyes, nose, and mouth) in typical and scrambled configurations to examine the impacts of part appearance and global configuration on the visual crowding of faces. Additionally, we used "electrical socket" flankers that mimicked first-order face configuration but had only schematic features, to examine the extent to which global face geometry impacted crowding. Our results indicated that both face parts and configurations contribute to visual crowding, suggesting that face similarity as realized under crowded conditions includes both aspects of facial appearance.

Citing Articles

Face cells encode object parts more than facial configuration of illusory faces.

Sharma S, Vinken K, Jagadeesh A, Livingstone M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9879.

PMID: 39543127 PMC: 11564726. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54323-w.


When the whole is only the parts: non-holistic object parts predominate face-cell responses to illusory faces.

Sharma S, Vinken K, Livingstone M bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37790322 PMC: 10542491. DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.22.558887.


Global and high-level effects in crowding cannot be predicted by either high-dimensional pooling or target cueing.

Bornet A, Choung O, Doerig A, Whitney D, Herzog M, Manassi M J Vis. 2021; 21(12):10.

PMID: 34812839 PMC: 8626847. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.12.10.


Visual crowding in driving.

Xia Y, Manassi M, Nakayama K, Zipser K, Whitney D J Vis. 2020; 20(6):1.

PMID: 32492098 PMC: 7416909. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.6.1.


Challenges to pooling models of crowding: Implications for visual mechanisms.

Rosenholtz R, Yu D, Keshvari S J Vis. 2019; 19(7):15.

PMID: 31348486 PMC: 6660188. DOI: 10.1167/19.7.15.


References
1.
Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G . Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 8(6):551-565. PMC: 2927138. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551. View

2.
Yamaguchi M, Hirukawa T, Kanazawa S . Judgment of gender through facial parts. Perception. 1995; 24(5):563-75. DOI: 10.1068/p240563. View

3.
Louie E, Bressler D, Whitney D . Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes. J Vis. 2008; 7(2):24.1-11. PMC: 3849395. DOI: 10.1167/7.2.24. View

4.
Nichols D, Betts L, Wilson H . Decoding of faces and face components in face-sensitive human visual cortex. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:28. PMC: 3153747. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00028. View

5.
Ariely D . Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(2):157-62. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00327. View