» Articles » PMID: 25338319

Development of a Robust RNA-based Classifier to Accurately Determine ER, PR, and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Clinical Samples

Abstract

Breast cancers are categorized into three subtypes based on protein expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/ERBB2). Patients enroll onto experimental clinical trials based on ER, PR, and HER2 status and, as receptor status is prognostic and defines treatment regimens, central receptor confirmation is critical for interpreting results from these trials. Patients enrolling onto experimental clinical trials in the metastatic setting often have limited available archival tissue that might better be used for comprehensive molecular profiling rather than slide-intensive reconfirmation of receptor status. We developed a Random Forests-based algorithm using a training set of 158 samples with centrally confirmed IHC status, and subsequently validated this algorithm on multiple test sets with known, locally determined IHC status. We observed a strong correlation between target mRNA expression and IHC assays for HER2 and ER, achieving an overall accuracy of 97 and 96%, respectively. For determining PR status, which had the highest discordance between central and local IHC, incorporation of expression of co-regulated genes in a multivariate approach added predictive value, outperforming the single, target gene approach by a 10% margin in overall accuracy. Our results suggest that multiplexed qRT-PCR profiling of ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 mRNA, along with several other subtype associated genes, can effectively confirm breast cancer subtype, thereby conserving tumor sections and enabling additional biomarker data to be obtained from patients enrolled onto experimental clinical trials.

Citing Articles

A spatially localized DNA linear classifier for cancer diagnosis.

Yang L, Tang Q, Zhang M, Tian Y, Chen X, Xu R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4583.

PMID: 38811607 PMC: 11136972. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48869-y.


Value of genomics- and radiomics-based machine learning models in the identification of breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Li G, Bian W, Bai Y, He S, Liu Y Ann Transl Med. 2023; 10(24):1394.

PMID: 36660694 PMC: 9843333. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-5986.


How Reliable Are Gene Expression-Based and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers Assessed on a Core-Needle Biopsy? A Study of Paired Core-Needle Biopsies and Surgical Specimens in Early Breast Cancer.

Saghir H, Veerla S, Malmberg M, Ryden L, Ehinger A, Saal L Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36010992 PMC: 9406531. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164000.


Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative.

Brueffer C, Vallon-Christersson J, Grabau D, Ehinger A, Hakkinen J, Hegardt C JCO Precis Oncol. 2020; 2.

PMID: 32913985 PMC: 7446376. DOI: 10.1200/PO.17.00135.


Diagnostic ability of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction versus immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 assessment in breast cancer: An Indian perspective.

Mehta A, Kumar D, Chadha P, Goswami M, Vishwakarma G, Panigrahi M Indian J Med Res. 2019; 150(3):254-260.

PMID: 31719296 PMC: 6886141. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_644_18.


References
1.
Elloumi F, Hu Z, Li Y, Parker J, Gulley M, Amos K . Systematic bias in genomic classification due to contaminating non-neoplastic tissue in breast tumor samples. BMC Med Genomics. 2011; 4:54. PMC: 3151208. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-54. View

2.
Bertucci F, Nasser V, Granjeaud S, Eisinger F, Adelaide J, Tagett R . Gene expression profiles of poor-prognosis primary breast cancer correlate with survival. Hum Mol Genet. 2002; 11(8):863-72. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.8.863. View

3.
J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

4.
Mohsin S, Weiss H, Havighurst T, Clark G, Berardo M, Roanh L . Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17(12):1545-54. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800229. View

5.
Perou C, Sorlie T, Eisen M, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey S, Rees C . Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406(6797):747-52. DOI: 10.1038/35021093. View