» Articles » PMID: 25336757

Form of an Evolutionary Tradeoff Affects Eco-evolutionary Dynamics in a Predator-prey System

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Oct 23
PMID 25336757
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evolution on a time scale similar to ecological dynamics has been increasingly recognized for the last three decades. Selection mediated by ecological interactions can change heritable phenotypic variation (i.e., evolution), and evolution of traits, in turn, can affect ecological interactions. Hence, ecological and evolutionary dynamics can be tightly linked and important to predict future dynamics, but our understanding of eco-evolutionary dynamics is still in its infancy and there is a significant gap between theoretical predictions and empirical tests. Empirical studies have demonstrated that the presence of genetic variation can dramatically change ecological dynamics, whereas theoretical studies predict that eco-evolutionary dynamics depend on the details of the genetic variation, such as the form of a tradeoff among genotypes, which can be more important than the presence or absence of the genetic variation. Using a predator-prey (rotifer-algal) experimental system in laboratory microcosms, we studied how different forms of a tradeoff between prey defense and growth affect eco-evolutionary dynamics. Our experimental results show for the first time to our knowledge that different forms of the tradeoff produce remarkably divergent eco-evolutionary dynamics, including near fixation, near extinction, and coexistence of algal genotypes, with quantitatively different population dynamics. A mathematical model, parameterized from completely independent experiments, explains the observed dynamics. The results suggest that knowing the details of heritable trait variation and covariation within a population is essential for understanding how evolution and ecology will interact and what form of eco-evolutionary dynamics will result.

Citing Articles

Trade-offs between defense and competitive traits in a planktonic predator-prey system.

Reveillon T, Becks L Ecology. 2024; 105(12):e4456.

PMID: 39468750 PMC: 11610692. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.4456.


Community Trait Variation Drives Selection on Species Diversity Through Feedback With Predator Density.

Vu P, Becks L Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70477.

PMID: 39450152 PMC: 11499210. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70477.


Predation drives complex eco-evolutionary dynamics in sexually selected traits.

Lerch B, Servedio M PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(4):e3002059.

PMID: 37011094 PMC: 10101644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002059.


The role of mathematical modelling in understanding prokaryotic predation.

Summers J, Kreft J Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1037407.

PMID: 36643414 PMC: 9835096. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1037407.


Evolution of population dynamics following invasion by a non-native predator.

Einum S, Ullern E, Walsh M, Burton T Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(9):e9348.

PMID: 36188513 PMC: 9487876. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9348.


References
1.
Andersson D, Hughes D . Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance?. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8(4):260-71. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2319. View

2.
Mougi A, Iwasa Y . Evolution towards oscillation or stability in a predator-prey system. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 277(1697):3163-71. PMC: 2982064. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0691. View

3.
Yamamichi M, Yoshida T, Sasaki A . Comparing the effects of rapid evolution and phenotypic plasticity on predator-prey dynamics. Am Nat. 2011; 178(3):287-304. DOI: 10.1086/661241. View

4.
Cortez M, Ellner S . Understanding rapid evolution in predator‐prey interactions using the theory of fast‐slow dynamical systems. Am Nat. 2010; 176(5):E109-27. DOI: 10.1086/656485. View

5.
Schoener T . The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science. 2011; 331(6016):426-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193954. View