» Articles » PMID: 25329799

Short and Long Term Effects of Left and Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Schizophrenia Patients with Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Oct 21
PMID 25329799
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left temporo-parietal junction area has been studied as a treatment option for auditory verbal hallucinations. Although the right temporo-parietal junction area has also shown involvement in the genesis of auditory verbal hallucinations, no studies have used bilateral stimulation. Moreover, little is known about durability effects. We studied the short and long term effects of 1 Hz treatment of the left temporo-parietal junction area in schizophrenia patients with persistent auditory verbal hallucinations, compared to sham stimulation, and added an extra treatment arm of bilateral TPJ area stimulation.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 51 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and persistent auditory verbal hallucinations were randomly allocated to treatment of the left or bilateral temporo-parietal junction area or sham treatment. Patients were treated for six days, twice daily for 20 minutes. Short term efficacy was measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS), and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). We included follow-up measures with the AHRS and PANAS at four weeks and three months.

Results: The interaction between time and treatment for Hallucination item P3 of the PANSS showed a trend for significance, caused by a small reduction of scores in the left group. Although self-reported hallucination scores, as measured with the AHRS and PANAS, decreased significantly during the trial period, there were no differences between the three treatment groups.

Conclusion: We did not find convincing evidence for the efficacy of left-sided rTMS, compared to sham rTMS. Moreover, bilateral rTMS was not superior over left rTMS or sham in improving AVH. Optimizing treatment parameters may result in stronger evidence for the efficacy of rTMS treatment of AVH. Moreover, future research should consider investigating factors predicting individual response.

Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register NTR1813.

Citing Articles

Investigating the effect of rTMS over the temporoparietal cortex on the Right Ear Advantage for perceived and imagined voices.

Prete G, Rollo B, Palumbo R, Ceccato I, Mammarella N, Di Domenico A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24930.

PMID: 39438571 PMC: 11496506. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75671-z.


Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Sabe M, Hyde J, Cramer C, Eberhard A, Crippa A, Brunoni A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(5):e2412616.

PMID: 38776083 PMC: 11112448. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12616.


Heterogeneous Brain Abnormalities in Schizophrenia Converge on a Common Network Associated With Symptom Remission.

Wang Y, Yang Y, Xu W, Yao X, Xie X, Zhang L Schizophr Bull. 2024; 50(3):545-556.

PMID: 38253437 PMC: 11059819. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae003.


Effectiveness of Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression in Older US Military Veterans.

Walker N, Philip N, Kozel F, Yesavage J, Madore M Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023; 32(3):315-325.

PMID: 37973487 PMC: 11231732. DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.10.010.


From Molecule to Patient Rehabilitation: The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Magnetic Stimulation on Stroke-A Narrative Review.

Badoiu A, Mitran S, Catalin B, Balseanu T, Popa-Wagner A, Gherghina F Neural Plast. 2023; 2023:5044065.

PMID: 36895285 PMC: 9991485. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5044065.


References
1.
Daalman K, Boks M, Diederen K, de Weijer A, Blom J, Kahn R . The same or different? A phenomenological comparison of auditory verbal hallucinations in healthy and psychotic individuals. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011; 72(3):320-5. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.09m05797yel. View

2.
Brunelin J, Mondino M, Gassab L, Haesebaert F, Gaha L, Suaud-Chagny M . Examining transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for hallucinations in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012; 169(7):719-24. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11071091. View

3.
Weinberger D, Berman K, Illowsky B . Physiological dysfunction of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. III. A new cohort and evidence for a monoaminergic mechanism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988; 45(7):609-15. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800310013001. View

4.
Lennox B, Park S, Medley I, Morris P, Jones P . The functional anatomy of auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2000; 100(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4927(00)00068-8. View

5.
Blumberger D, Christensen B, Zipursky R, Moller B, Chen R, Fitzgerald P . MRI-targeted repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of Heschl's gyrus for refractory auditory hallucinations. Brain Stimul. 2012; 5(4):577-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.002. View