» Articles » PMID: 25329411

Contrasting Roles for MyoD in Organizing Myogenic Promoter Structures During Embryonic Skeletal Muscle Development

Overview
Journal Dev Dyn
Publisher Wiley
Date 2014 Oct 21
PMID 25329411
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Among the complexities of skeletal muscle differentiation is a temporal distinction in the onset of expression of different lineage-specific genes. The lineage-determining factor MyoD is bound to myogenic genes at the onset of differentiation whether gene activation is immediate or delayed. How temporal regulation of differentiation-specific genes is established remains unclear.

Results: Using embryonic tissue, we addressed the molecular differences in the organization of the myogenin and muscle creatine kinase (MCK) gene promoters by examining regulatory factor binding as a function of both time and spatial organization during somitogenesis. At the myogenin promoter, binding of the homeodomain factor Pbx1 coincided with H3 hyperacetylation and was followed by binding of co-activators that modulate chromatin structure. MyoD and myogenin binding occurred subsequently, demonstrating that Pbx1 facilitates chromatin remodeling and modification before myogenic regulatory factor binding. At the same time, the MCK promoter was bound by HDAC2 and MyoD, and activating histone marks were largely absent. The association of HDAC2 and MyoD was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation, proximity ligation assay (PLA), and sequential ChIP.

Conclusions: MyoD differentially promotes activated and repressed chromatin structures at myogenic genes early after the onset of skeletal muscle differentiation in the developing mouse embryo.

Citing Articles

Transcriptomic adaptation of skeletal muscle in response to MICT and HIIT exercise modalities.

Hong W, Luan Y, Zheng J, Xiong Y, Zhang B, Ma Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318782.

PMID: 39999092 PMC: 11856427. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318782.


Cysteine Rich Intestinal Protein 2 is a copper-responsive regulator of skeletal muscle differentiation and metal homeostasis.

Verdejo-Torres O, Klein D, Novoa-Aponte L, Carrazco-Carrillo J, Bonilla-Pinto D, Rivera A PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(12):e1011495.

PMID: 39637238 PMC: 11671023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011495.


Cysteine Rich Intestinal Protein 2 is a copper-responsive regulator of skeletal muscle differentiation.

Verdejo-Torres O, Klein D, Novoa-Aponte L, Carrazco-Carrillo J, Bonilla-Pinto D, Rivera A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38746126 PMC: 11092763. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.03.592485.


Actin-related protein 5 functions as a novel modulator of MyoD and MyoG in skeletal muscle and in rhabdomyosarcoma.

Morita T, Hayashi K Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35348112 PMC: 8983046. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.77746.


DamID identifies targets of CEH-60/PBX that are associated with neuron development and muscle structure in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Van de Walle P, Munoz-Jimenez C, Askjaer P, Schoofs L, Temmerman L PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0242939.

PMID: 33306687 PMC: 7732058. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242939.


References
1.
Guasconi V, Puri P . Chromatin: the interface between extrinsic cues and the epigenetic regulation of muscle regeneration. Trends Cell Biol. 2009; 19(6):286-94. PMC: 2807132. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.002. View

2.
Sartorelli V, Caretti G . Mechanisms underlying the transcriptional regulation of skeletal myogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005; 15(5):528-35. PMC: 1283108. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.04.015. View

3.
Lee K, Workman J . Histone acetyltransferase complexes: one size doesn't fit all. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8(4):284-95. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2145. View

4.
Bergstrom D, Penn B, Strand A, Perry R, Rudnicki M, Tapscott S . Promoter-specific regulation of MyoD binding and signal transduction cooperate to pattern gene expression. Mol Cell. 2002; 9(3):587-600. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00481-1. View

5.
Tomczak K, Marinescu V, Ramoni M, Sanoudou D, Montanaro F, Han M . Expression profiling and identification of novel genes involved in myogenic differentiation. FASEB J. 2003; 18(2):403-5. DOI: 10.1096/fj.03-0568fje. View