» Articles » PMID: 25323889

Cost-effectiveness of Drug-eluting Vs. Bare-metal Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease from the Korean National Health Insurance Database

Overview
Journal Yonsei Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Oct 18
PMID 25323889
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs), as compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs) in Korea.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2000 and December 2007. Subjects were stent-treated for the first time between 2004 and 2005, with four years of follow-up (2004-2007) (n=43674). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to calculate the costs of DESs compared with BMSs among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Cost-effectiveness was assessed with effectiveness defined as a reduction in major adverse cardiac events after six months and after one, two, three, and four years.

Results: The total costs of a DESs were 674108 Korean won (KRW) higher than that of a BMSs at the end of the follow-up; 13635 thousand KRW per patient treated with DESs and 12960 thousand KRW per patient treated with BMSs. The ICER was 256315 per KRW/death avoided and 293090 per KRW/re-stenting avoided among the CAD patients at the end of the follow-up.

Conclusion: The ICER for the high-risk patients was lower than that for the low-risk patients. The use of DESs is clinically more useful than the use of BMSs for CAD and myocardial infarction patients, especially for those considered to be high-risk patients in Korea.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Korea: a nationwide population-based study.

Kim H, Kim S, Han S, Rane P, Fox K, Qian Y BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1112.

PMID: 31412823 PMC: 6694551. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7439-0.


Therapeutic Hypothermia for Cardioprotection in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Kang I, Fumiaki I, Pyun W Yonsei Med J. 2016; 57(2):291-7.

PMID: 26847278 PMC: 4740518. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.291.


Changes in the Practice of Coronary Revascularization between 2006 and 2010 in the Republic of Korea.

Choi Y, Kim J, Cho S, Cho J, Sohn J, Cho S Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56(4):895-903.

PMID: 26069109 PMC: 4479855. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.895.

References
1.
Morice M, Colombo A, Meier B, Serruys P, Tamburino C, Guagliumi G . Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006; 295(8):895-904. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.8.895. View

2.
Lee K, Lee S . Effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system operated by the voluntarily participating providers on the cesarean section rates in Korea. Health Policy. 2006; 81(2-3):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.019. View

3.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

4.
Jeong M, Kim S, Ahn Y, Cho J, Park J, Na K . Predictive factors for the second restenosis after coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 50(1):34-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200005)50:1<34::aid-ccd7>3.0.co;2-l. View

5.
Serruys P, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G . A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(8):489-95. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801. View