» Articles » PMID: 25316895

Aerosol Distribution During Open Suctioning and Long-term Surveillance of Air Quality in a Respiratory Care Center Within a Medical Center

Overview
Journal Respir Care
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2014 Oct 16
PMID 25316895
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The investigation of hospital air quality has been conducted in wards, ICUs, operating theaters, and public areas. Few studies have assessed air quality in respiratory care centers (RCCs), especially in mechanically ventilated patients with open suctioning.

Methods: The RCC air quality indices (temperature, relative humidity, levels of CO2, total volatile organic compounds, particulate matter [PM], bacteria, and fungi) were monitored over 1 y. The air around the patient's head was sampled during open suctioning to examine the probability of bioaerosol exposure affecting health-care workers.

Results: This investigation found that the levels of indoor air pollutants (CO2, PM, bacteria, and fungi) were below the indoor air quality standard set by the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency. Meanwhile, the levels of total volatile organic compounds sometimes exceeded the indoor air quality standard, particularly in August. The identified bacterial genera included Micrococcus species, Corynebacterium species, and Staphylococcus species, and the predominant fungal genera included yeast, Aspergillus species, Scopulariopsis species, and Trichoderma species. Additionally, airborne PM2.5, PM1, and bacteria were clearly raised during open suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients. This phenomenon demonstrated that open suctioning may increase the bacterial exposure risk of health-care workers.

Conclusions: RCC air quality deserves long-term monitoring and evaluation. Health-care workers must implement self-protection strategies during open suctioning to ensure their occupational health and safety in health-care settings.

Citing Articles

Indoor CO monitoring in a surgical intensive care unit under visitation restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chou Y, Wang Z, Chang H, Liu Y, Su P, Huang Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1052452.

PMID: 37521349 PMC: 10375033. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1052452.


In vitro investigation of the Flusso™ Bypass adapter efficiency upon ventilator circuit disconnect in a clinical simulated environment.

Mehri R, Alatrash A, Ogrodnik N, Matida E, Fiorenza F Can J Respir Ther. 2020; 56:86-91.

PMID: 33313385 PMC: 7724989. DOI: 10.29390/cjrt-2020-033.


Workplace exposure to carbon dioxide during routine laparoscopy - is it safe?.

Af Petersens M, Andersson Fenger-Krog F, Jakobsson J F1000Res. 2020; 9:571.

PMID: 33024549 PMC: 7520708. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.24230.2.


Tracheostomy care and decannulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary clinical practice guideline.

Rovira A, Dawson D, Walker A, Tornari C, Dinham A, Foden N Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 278(2):313-321.

PMID: 32556788 PMC: 7299456. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06126-0.


Aerosol-generating procedures and infective risk to healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2: the limits of the evidence.

Harding H, Broom A, Broom J J Hosp Infect. 2020; 105(4):717-725.

PMID: 32497651 PMC: 7263217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.037.