» Articles » PMID: 25315439

Symmetries and Pattern Formation in Hyperbolic Versus Parabolic Models of Self-organised Aggregation

Overview
Journal J Math Biol
Date 2014 Oct 16
PMID 25315439
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study of self-organised collective animal behaviour, such as swarms of insects or schools of fish, has become over the last decade a very active research area in mathematical biology. Parabolic and hyperbolic models have been used intensively to describe the formation and movement of various aggregative behaviours. While both types of models can exhibit aggregation-type patterns, studies on hyperbolic models suggest that these models can display a larger variety of spatial and spatio-temporal patterns compared to their parabolic counterparts. Here we use stability, symmetry and bifurcation theory to investigate this observation more rigorously, an approach not attempted before to compare and contrast aggregation patterns in models for collective animal behaviors. To this end, we consider a class of nonlocal hyperbolic models for self-organised aggregations that incorporate various inter-individual communication mechanisms, and take the formal parabolic limit to transform them into nonlocal parabolic models. We then discuss the symmetry of these nonlocal hyperbolic and parabolic models, and the types of bifurcations present or lost when taking the parabolic limit. We show that the parabolic limit leads to a homogenisation of the inter-individual communication, and to a loss of bifurcation dynamics (in particular loss of Hopf bifurcations). This explains the less rich patterns exhibited by the nonlocal parabolic models. However, for multiple interacting populations, by breaking the population interchange symmetry of the model, one can preserve the Hopf bifurcations that lead to the formation of complex spatio-temporal patterns that describe moving aggregations.

Citing Articles

Non-local Parabolic and Hyperbolic Models for Cell Polarisation in Heterogeneous Cancer Cell Populations.

Bitsouni V, Eftimie R Bull Math Biol. 2018; 80(10):2600-2632.

PMID: 30136211 PMC: 6153854. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-018-0477-4.

References
1.
Larkin R, Szafoni R . Evidence for widely dispersed birds migrating together at night. Integr Comp Biol. 2011; 48(1):40-9. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icn038. View

2.
Eftimie R, de Vries G, Lewis M, Lutscher F . Modeling group formation and activity patterns in self-organizing collectives of individuals. Bull Math Biol. 2007; 69(5):1537-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-006-9175-8. View

3.
Buhl C, Sumpter D, Couzin I, Hale J, Despland E, Miller E . From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science. 2006; 312(5778):1402-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1125142. View

4.
Eftimie R . Simultaneous use of different communication mechanisms leads to spatial sorting and unexpected collective behaviours in animal groups. J Theor Biol. 2013; 337:42-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.001. View

5.
Armstrong N, Painter K, Sherratt J . A continuum approach to modelling cell-cell adhesion. J Theor Biol. 2006; 243(1):98-113. PMC: 1941683. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.030. View