» Articles » PMID: 25311558

Properties of Selected Mutations and Genotypic Landscapes Under Fisher's Geometric Model

Overview
Journal Evolution
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Oct 15
PMID 25311558
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The fitness landscape-the mapping between genotypes and fitness-determines properties of the process of adaptation. Several small genotypic fitness landscapes have recently been built by selecting a handful of beneficial mutations and measuring fitness of all combinations of these mutations. Here, we generate several testable predictions for the properties of these small genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. When the ancestral strain is far from the fitness optimum, we analytically compute the fitness effect of selected mutations and their epistatic interactions. Epistasis may be negative or positive on average depending on the distance of the ancestral genotype to the optimum and whether mutations were independently selected, or coselected in an adaptive walk. Simulations show that genotypic landscapes built from Fisher's model are very close to an additive landscape when the ancestral strain is far from the optimum. However, when it is close to the optimum, a large diversity of landscape with substantial roughness and sign epistasis emerged. Strikingly, small genotypic landscapes built from several replicate adaptive walks on the same underlying landscape were highly variable, suggesting that several realizations of small genotypic landscapes are needed to gain information about the underlying architecture of the fitness landscape.

Citing Articles

Unpredictability of the Fitness Effects of Antimicrobial Resistance Mutations Across Environments in Escherichia coli.

Hinz A, Amado A, Kassen R, Bank C, Wong A Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(5).

PMID: 38709811 PMC: 11110942. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae086.


Fisher's Geometric Model as a Tool to Study Speciation.

Schneemann H, De Sanctis B, Welch J Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2024; 16(7.

PMID: 38253415 PMC: 11216183. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041442.


Environmental modulation of global epistasis in a drug resistance fitness landscape.

Diaz-Colunga J, Sanchez A, Ogbunugafor C Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):8055.

PMID: 38052815 PMC: 10698197. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43806-x.


Evolutionary rescue on genotypic fitness landscapes.

Wahl L, Campos P J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(208):20230424.

PMID: 37963553 PMC: 10645506. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0424.


A null model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations.

Cotto O, Day T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(23):e2218200120.

PMID: 37252948 PMC: 10266029. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2218200120.


References
1.
Gros P, Tenaillon O . Selection for chaperone-like mediated genetic robustness at low mutation rate: impact of drift, epistasis and complexity. Genetics. 2009; 182(2):555-64. PMC: 2691763. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.099366. View

2.
Rowe W, Platt M, Wedge D, Day P, Kell D, Knowles J . Analysis of a complete DNA-protein affinity landscape. J R Soc Interface. 2009; 7(44):397-408. PMC: 2842790. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0193. View

3.
Poelwijk F, Tanase-Nicola S, Kiviet D, Tans S . Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. J Theor Biol. 2010; 272(1):141-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.015. View

4.
Lunzer M, Miller S, Felsheim R, Dean A . The biochemical architecture of an ancient adaptive landscape. Science. 2005; 310(5747):499-501. DOI: 10.1126/science.1115649. View

5.
Tenaillon O, Rodriguez-Verdugo A, Gaut R, McDonald P, Bennett A, Long A . The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science. 2012; 335(6067):457-61. DOI: 10.1126/science.1212986. View