» Articles » PMID: 25302010

Effect of Injection Technique on Temporal Parametric Imaging Derived from Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patient Specific Phantoms

Overview
Date 2014 Oct 11
PMID 25302010
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Parametric imaging maps (PIM's) derived from digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the cerebral arterial flow assessment in clinical settings have been proposed, but experiments have yet to determine the reliability of such studies. For this study, we have observed the effects of different injection techniques on PIM's. A flow circuit set to physiologic conditions was created using an internal carotid artery phantom. PIM's were derived for two catheter positions, two different contrast bolus injection volumes (5ml and 10 ml), and four injection rates (5, 10, 15 and 20 ml/s). Using a gamma variate fitting approach, we derived PIM's for mean-transit-time (MTT), time-to-peak (TTP) and bolus-arrivaltime (BAT). For the same injection rates, a larger bolus resulted in an increased MTT and TTP, while a faster injection rate resulted in a shorter MTT, TTP, and BAT. In addition, the position of the catheter tip within the vasculature directly affected the PIM. The experiment showed that the PIM is strongly correlated with the injection conditions, and, therefore, they have to be interpreted with caution. PIM images must be taken from the same patient to be able to be meaningfully compared. These comparisons can include pre- and post-treatment images taken immediately before and after an interventional procedure or simultaneous arterial flow comparisons through the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Due to the strong correlation between PIM and injection conditions, this study indicates that this assessment method should be used only to compare flow changes before and after treatment within the same patient using the same injection conditions.

Citing Articles

Application of and Prospects for 3-Dimensional Printing in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions.

Mao Y, Liu Y, Zhai M, Yang J Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(2):61.

PMID: 39077424 PMC: 11273148. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2402061.


Enhancing cerebral vasculature analysis with pathlength-corrected 2D angiographic parametric imaging: A feasibility study.

Shields A, Williams K, Shiraz Bhurwani M, Nagesh S, Chivukula V, Bednarek D Med Phys. 2023; 51(4):2633-2647.

PMID: 37864843 PMC: 10994741. DOI: 10.1002/mp.16808.


Investigating Angiographic Injection Parameters for Cerebral Aneurysm Hemodynamic Characterization Using Patient-Specific Simulated Angiograms.

White R, Shields A, Nagesh S, Smith E, Davies J, Bednarek D Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023; 12468.

PMID: 37425071 PMC: 10327470. DOI: 10.1117/12.2653871.


2D versus 3D comparison of angiographic imaging biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics simulations of contrast injections.

Shields A, Bhurwani M, Williams K, Chivukula V, Bednarek D, Rudin S Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023; 12463.

PMID: 37424835 PMC: 10327468. DOI: 10.1117/12.2653119.


Angiographic velocimetry analysis using contrast dilution gradient method with a 1000 frames per second photon-counting detector.

Williams K, Shields A, Nagesh S, Chudzik M, Bednarek D, Rudin S J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023; 10(3):033502.

PMID: 37287600 PMC: 10242414. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.3.033502.


References
1.
Seidel G, Meyer-Wiethe K, Berdien G, Hollstein D, Toth D, Aach T . Ultrasound perfusion imaging in acute middle cerebral artery infarction predicts outcome. Stroke. 2004; 35(5):1107-11. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000124125.19773.40. View

2.
Tenjin H, Asakura F, Nakahara Y, Matsumoto K, Matsuo T, Urano F . Evaluation of intraaneurysmal blood velocity by time-density curve analysis and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998; 19(7):1303-7. PMC: 8332224. View

3.
Ionita C, Paciorek A, Dohatcu A, Hoffmann K, Bednarek D, Kolega J . The asymmetric vascular stent: efficacy in a rabbit aneurysm model. Stroke. 2009; 40(3):959-65. PMC: 2692717. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524124. View

4.
Ionita C, Natarajan S, Wang W, Hopkins L, Levy E, Siddiqui A . Evaluation of a second-generation self-expanding variable-porosity flow diverter in a rabbit elastase aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(8):1399-407. PMC: 3411317. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2548. View

5.
Shpilfoygel S, Close R, Valentino D, Duckwiler G . X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature. Med Phys. 2000; 27(9):2008-23. DOI: 10.1118/1.1288669. View