Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of EPRO Measurement in Clinical Trials
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important means of evaluating the treatment benefit of new medical products. It is recognized that PRO measures should be used when assessing concepts best known by the patient or best measured from the patient's perspective. As a result, there is growing emphasis on well defined and reliable PRO measures. In addition, advances in technology have significantly increased electronic PRO (ePRO) data collection capabilities and options in clinical trials. The movement from paper-based to ePRO data capture has enhanced the integrity and accuracy of clinical trial data and is encouraged by regulators. A primary distinction in the types of ePRO platforms is between telephone-based interactive voice response systems and screen-based systems. Handheld touchscreen-based devices have become the mainstay for remote (i.e., off-site, unsupervised) PRO data collection in clinical trials. The conventional approach is to provide study subjects with a handheld device with a device-based proprietary software program. However, an emerging alternative for clinical trials is called bring your own device (BYOD). Leveraging study subjects' own Internet-enabled mobile devices for remote PRO data collection (via a downloadable app or a Web-based data collection portal) has become possible due to the widespread use of personal smartphones and tablets. However, there are a number of scientific and operational issues that must be addressed before BYOD can be routinely considered as a practical alternative to conventional ePRO data collection methods. Nevertheless, the future for ePRO data collection is bright and the promise of BYOD opens a new chapter in its evolution.
Taccardi D, Gowdy H, Li V, Wing A, Baharnoori M, Finlayson M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e095357.
PMID: 40044201 PMC: 11883553. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095357.
Principles of good practice for translation of electronic clinical outcome assessments.
Shalhoub H, Turner M, Bradley-Gilbride A, Eremenco S, Muehlan H, Parks-Vernizzi E J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025; 9(1):26.
PMID: 40036000 PMC: 11880485. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-025-00859-4.
Bandos H, Torres-Saavedra P, Culakova E, Gunn H, Lee M, Duan F J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2025; 2025(68):14-21.
PMID: 39989038 PMC: 11848031. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae047.
Meirte J, Hellemans N, Daele U, Maertens K, Denteneer L, Anthonissen M Eur Burn J. 2024; 5(4):321-334.
PMID: 39727906 PMC: 11727002. DOI: 10.3390/ebj5040030.
Lehmann J, Krepper D, Pe M, Kulis D, Giesinger J, Sztankay M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(9):e084935.
PMID: 39260865 PMC: 11409248. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084935.