» Articles » PMID: 25293722

Detection and Measurement of Surface Contamination by Multiple Antineoplastic Drugs Using Multiplex Bead Assay

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Oncology
Pharmacy
Date 2014 Oct 9
PMID 25293722
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Contamination of workplace surfaces by antineoplastic drugs presents an exposure risk for healthcare workers. Traditional instrumental methods to detect contamination such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are sensitive and accurate but expensive. Since immunochemical methods may be cheaper and faster than instrumental methods, we wanted to explore their use for routine drug residue detection for preventing worker exposure.

Methods: In this study we examined the feasibility of using fluorescence covalent microbead immunosorbent assay (FCMIA) for simultaneous detection and semi-quantitative measurement of three antineoplastic drugs (5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin). The concentration ranges for the assay were 0-1000 ng/ml for 5-fluorouracil, 0-100 ng/ml for paclitaxel, and 0-2 ng/ml for doxorubicin. The surface sampling technique involved wiping a loaded surface with a swab wetted with wash buffer, extracting the swab in storage/blocking buffer, and measuring drugs in the extract using FCMIA.

Results: There was no significant cross-reactivity between these drugs at the ranges studied indicated by a lack of response in the assay to cross analytes. The limit of detection (LOD) for 5-fluorouracil on the surface studied was 0.93 ng/cm(2) with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 2.8 ng/cm(2), the LOD for paclitaxel was 0.57 ng/cm(2) with an LOQ of 2.06 ng/cm(2), and the LOD for doxorubicin was 0.0036 ng/cm(2) with an LOQ of 0.013 ng/cm(2).

Conclusion: The use of FCMIA with a simple sampling technique has potential for low cost simultaneous detection and semi-quantitative measurement of surface contamination from multiple antineoplastic drugs.

Citing Articles

Cytostatics in Indoor Environment: An Update of Analytical Methods.

Portilha-Cunha M, Alves A, Santos M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14(6).

PMID: 34204005 PMC: 8232629. DOI: 10.3390/ph14060574.


New approaches to wipe sampling methods for antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in healthcare settings.

Connor T, Smith J Pharm Technol Hosp Pharm. 2017; 1(3):107-114.

PMID: 28459100 PMC: 5406133. DOI: 10.1515/pthp-2016-0009.

References
1.
Oliver K, Kettman J, Fulton R . Multiplexed analysis of human cytokines by use of the FlowMetrix system. Clin Chem. 1998; 44(9):2057-60. View

2.
Sessink P, Connor T, Jorgenson J, Tyler T . Reduction in surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in 22 hospital pharmacies in the US following implementation of a closed-system drug transfer device. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2010; 17(1):39-48. PMC: 4627487. DOI: 10.1177/1078155210361431. View

3.
Pretty J, Connor T, Spasojevic I, Kurtz K, McLaurin J, BHymer C . Sampling and mass spectrometric analytical methods for five antineoplastic drugs in the healthcare environment. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2010; 18(1):23-36. PMC: 4681574. DOI: 10.1177/1078155210389215. View

4.
Hon C, Teschke K, Demers P, Venners S . Antineoplastic drug contamination on the hands of employees working throughout the hospital medication system. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014; 58(6):761-70. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meu019. View

5.
Bower M, Veraitch O, Szydlo R, Charles P, Kelleher P, Gazzard B . Cytokine changes during rituximab therapy in HIV-associated multicentric Castleman disease. Blood. 2009; 113(19):4521-4. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-197053. View