» Articles » PMID: 25289665

Non-invasive Prenatal Chromosomal Aneuploidy Testing--clinical Experience: 100,000 Clinical Samples

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Oct 8
PMID 25289665
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: As the first laboratory to offer massively parallel sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidies, Sequenom Laboratories has been able to collect the largest clinical population experience data to date, including >100,000 clinical samples from all 50 U.S. states and 13 other countries. The objective of this study is to give a robust clinical picture of the current laboratory performance of the MaterniT21 PLUS LDT.

Study Design: The study includes plasma samples collected from patients with high-risk pregnancies in our CLIA-licensed, CAP-accredited laboratory between August 2012 to June 2013. Samples were assessed for trisomies 13, 18, 21 and for the presence of chromosome Y-specific DNA. Sample data and ad hoc outcome information provided by the clinician was compiled and reviewed to determine the characteristics of this patient population, as well as estimate the assay performance in a clinical setting.

Results: NIPT patients most commonly undergo testing at an average of 15 weeks, 3 days gestation; and average 35.1 years of age. The average turnaround time is 4.54 business days and an overall 1.3% not reportable rate. The positivity rate for Trisomy 21 was 1.51%, followed by 0.45% and 0.21% rate for Trisomies 18 and 13, respectively. NIPT positivity rates are similar to previous large clinical studies of aneuploidy in women of maternal age ≥ 35 undergoing amniocentesis. In this population 3519 patients had multifetal gestations (3.5%) with 2.61% yielding a positive NIPT result.

Conclusion: NIPT has been commercially offered for just over 2 years and the clinical use by patients and clinicians has increased significantly. The risks associated with invasive testing have been substantially reduced by providing another assessment of aneuploidy status in high-risk patients. The accuracy and NIPT assay positivity rate are as predicted by clinical validations and the test demonstrates improvement in the current standard of care.

Citing Articles

The value of increasing sequencing depth for noninvasive prenatal screening for whole chromosomal aneuploidy.

Wang D, Guo F, Hou Y, Peng H, Hu T, Yang J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2673.

PMID: 39837955 PMC: 11750967. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87218-x.


MaterniCode: New Bioinformatic Pipeline to Detect Fetal Aneuploidies and Rearrangements Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Gabrielli F, Papa F, Di Pietro F, Paytuvi-Gallart A, Julian D, Sanseverino W Int J Genomics. 2024; 2024:8859058.

PMID: 38962150 PMC: 11221998. DOI: 10.1155/2024/8859058.


Clinical Experience with Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Twin Pregnancy Samples at a Single Center in Germany.

Eiben B, Glaubitz R, Winkler T, Teubert A, Borth H J Lab Physicians. 2023; 15(4):590-595.

PMID: 37780866 PMC: 10539069. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770066.


Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Jayashankar S, Nasaruddin M, Hassan M, Dasrilsyah R, Shafiee M, Ismail N Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37568933 PMC: 10417786. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152570.


Analysis of retest reliability for pregnant women undergoing cfDNA testing with a no-call result.

He S, Zhang Q, Chen M, Chen X, Liang B, Lin N Mol Biol Rep. 2023; 50(9):7649-7657.

PMID: 37535243 PMC: 10460704. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08591-2.


References
1.
Benn P, Borrell A, Cuckle H, Dugoff L, Gross S, Johnson J . Prenatal Detection of Down Syndrome using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS): a rapid response statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, 24 October 2011. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1002/pd.2919. View

2.
Tabor A, Vestergaard C, Lidegaard O . Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34(1):19-24. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6377. View

3.
Alfirevic Z, Sundberg K, Brigham S . Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (3):CD003252. PMC: 4171981. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252. View

4.
Forabosco A, Percesepe A, Santucci S . Incidence of non-age-dependent chromosomal abnormalities: a population-based study on 88965 amniocenteses. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 17(7):897-903. PMC: 2986487. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.265. View

5.
Nygren A, Dean J, Jensen T, Kruse S, Kwong W, Van Den Boom D . Quantification of fetal DNA by use of methylation-based DNA discrimination. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(10):1627-35. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.146290. View