» Articles » PMID: 25285961

Synchrony of Maternal Auditory and Visual Cues About Unknown Words to Children with and Without Cochlear Implants

Overview
Journal Ear Hear
Date 2014 Oct 7
PMID 25285961
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare types of maternal auditory-visual input about word referents available to children with cochlear implants, children with normal hearing matched for age, and children with normal hearing matched for vocabulary size. Although other works have considered the acoustic qualities of maternal input provided to children with cochlear implants, this study is the first to consider auditory-visual maternal input provided to children with cochlear implants.

Design: Participants included 30 mother-child dyads from three groups: children who wore cochlear implants (n = 10 dyads), children matched for chronological age (n = 10 dyads), and children matched for expressive vocabulary size (n = 10 dyads). All participants came from English-speaking families, with the families of children with hearing loss committed to developing listening and spoken language skills (not sign language). All mothers had normal hearing. Mother-child interactions were video recorded during mealtimes in the home. Each dyad participated in two mealtime observations. Maternal utterances were transcribed and coded for (a) nouns produced, (b) child-directed utterances, (c) nouns unknown to children per maternal report, and (d) auditory and visual cues provided about referents for unknown nouns. Auditory and visual cues were coded as either converging, diverging, or auditory-only.

Results: Mothers of children with cochlear implants provided percentages of converging and diverging cues that were similar to the percentages of mothers of children matched for chronological age. Mothers of children matched for vocabulary size, on the other hand, provided a higher percentage of converging auditory-visual cues and lower percentage of diverging cues than did mothers of children with cochlear implants. Groups did not differ in provision of auditory-only cues.

Conclusions: The present study represents the first step toward identification of environmental input characteristics that may affect lexical learning outcomes of children with cochlear implants. Given that children with cochlear implants demonstrate slower rates of lexical growth than children with normal hearing, the findings from this study provide an important direction for further investigation of how environmental factors affect lexical outcomes for this population. If mothers can provide auditory and visual cues to increase the salience of a relevant object in word-learning contexts, they may be able to facilitate the language growth of their children.

Citing Articles

Parent-Child Joint Behaviors in Novel Object Play Create High-Quality Data for Word Learning.

Chen C, Houston D, Yu C Child Dev. 2021; 92(5):1889-1905.

PMID: 34463350 PMC: 8478720. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13620.


A Technology-Assisted Language Intervention for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Meinzen-Derr J, Sheldon R, Altaye M, Lane L, Mays L, Wiley S Pediatrics. 2021; 147(2).

PMID: 33452063 PMC: 7891685. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-025734.


Parental use of multimodal cues in the initiation of joint attention as a function of child hearing status.

Gabouer A, Oghalai J, Bortfeld H Discourse Process. 2020; 57(5-6):491-506.

PMID: 32669749 PMC: 7363029. DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2020.1759022.


Early Vocabulary Profiles of Young Deaf Children Who Use Cochlear Implants.

Jung J, Reed J, Wagner L, Stephens J, Warner-Czyz A, Uhler K J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(4):1254-1269.

PMID: 32302250 PMC: 7242983. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00315.


What leads to coordinated attention in parent-toddler interactions? Children's hearing status matters.

Chen C, Castellanos I, Yu C, Houston D Dev Sci. 2019; 23(3):e12919.

PMID: 31680414 PMC: 7160036. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12919.


References
1.
Gogate L, Hollich G . Invariance detection within an interactive system: a perceptual gateway to language development. Psychol Rev. 2010; 117(2):496-516. DOI: 10.1037/a0019049. View

2.
Bahrick L, Lickliter R . Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Dev Psychol. 2000; 36(2):190-201. PMC: 2704001. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.36.2.190. View

3.
Gogate L, Bahrick L, Watson J . A study of multimodal motherese: the role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures. Child Dev. 2000; 71(4):878-94. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00197. View

4.
Matatyaho D, Gogate L . Type of Maternal Object Motion During Synchronous Naming Predicts Preverbal Infants' Learning of Word-Object Relations. Infancy. 2021; 13(2):172-184. DOI: 10.1080/15250000701795655. View

5.
Nott P, Cowan R, Brown P, Wigglesworth G . Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part I--the time period taken to acquire first words and first word combinations. Ear Hear. 2009; 30(5):526-40. DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181a9ea14. View