» Articles » PMID: 25285793

Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Men Who Have Sex with Men: Risk Calculators for Real-world Decision-making

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Oct 7
PMID 25285793
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can be clinically effective and cost-effective for HIV prevention in high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). However, individual patients have different risk profiles, real-world populations vary, and no practical tools exist to guide clinical decisions or public health strategies. We introduce a practical model of HIV acquisition, including both a personalized risk calculator for clinical management and a cost-effectiveness calculator for population-level decisions.

Methods: We developed a decision-analytic model of PrEP for MSM. The primary clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness outcomes were the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one HIV infection, and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. We characterized patients according to risk factors including PrEP adherence, condom use, sexual frequency, background HIV prevalence and antiretroviral therapy use.

Results: With standard PrEP adherence and national epidemiologic parameters, the estimated NNT was 64 (95% uncertainty range: 26, 176) at a cost of $160,000 (cost saving, $740,000) per QALY--comparable to other published models. With high (35%) HIV prevalence, the NNT was 35 (21, 57), and cost per QALY was $27,000 (cost saving, $160,000), and with high PrEP adherence, the NNT was 30 (14, 69), and cost per QALY was $3,000 (cost saving, $200,000). In contrast, for monogamous, serodiscordant relationships with partner antiretroviral therapy use, the NNT was 90 (39, 157) and cost per QALY was $280,000 ($14,000, $670,000).

Conclusions: PrEP results vary widely across individuals and populations. Risk calculators may aid in patient education, clinical decision-making, and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Citing Articles

Establishing evidence criteria for implementation strategies in the US: a Delphi study for HIV services.

McKay V, Zamantakis A, Pachicano A, Merle J, Purrier M, Swan M Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):50.

PMID: 39010153 PMC: 11251241. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01379-3.


Restarting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kiggundu R, Soh Q, Tieosapjaroen W, Fairley C, Tucker J, Tang W EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 72:102647.

PMID: 38800799 PMC: 11127197. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102647.


Establishing Evidence Criteria for Implementation Strategies: A Delphi Study for HIV Services.

Mckay V, Zamantakis A, Pachicano A, Merle J, Purrier M, Swan M Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38464091 PMC: 10925451. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3979631/v1.


Cost-effectiveness of Cabotegravir Long-Acting for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States.

Brogan A, Davis A, Mellott C, Fraysse J, Metzner A, Oglesby A Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(4):447-461.

PMID: 38267806 PMC: 10937761. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01342-y.


Appropriate usage of post-exposure prophylaxis-in-pocket for HIV prevention by individuals with low-frequency exposures.

Clifford Rashotte M, Yoong D, Naccarato M, Pico Espinosa O, Fisher K, Bogoch I Int J STD AIDS. 2023; 35(6):446-451.

PMID: 37963270 PMC: 11047008. DOI: 10.1177/09564624231215151.


References
1.
Koppenhaver R, Sorensen S, Farnham P, Sansom S . The cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men in the United States: an epidemic model. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 58(2):e51-2. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31822b74fe. View

2.
Vittinghoff E, Douglas J, Judson F, McKirnan D, MacQueen K, Buchbinder S . Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010003. View

3.
Grant R, Lama J, Anderson P, McMahan V, Liu A, Vargas L . Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(27):2587-99. PMC: 3079639. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. View

4.
Morris S, Klausner J, Buchbinder S, Wheeler S, Koblin B, Coates T . Prevalence and incidence of pharyngeal gonorrhea in a longitudinal sample of men who have sex with men: the EXPLORE study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43(10):1284-9. DOI: 10.1086/508460. View

5.
Hosek S, Siberry G, Bell M, Lally M, Kapogiannis B, Green K . The acceptability and feasibility of an HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trial with young men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013; 62(4):447-56. PMC: 3656981. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182801081. View