» Articles » PMID: 25278455

Number of Courses of Induction Therapy Independently Predicts Outcome After Allogeneic Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Morphological Remission

Overview
Date 2014 Oct 4
PMID 25278455
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whether the number of chemotherapy cycles required to obtain a first morphological remission affects prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial. To clarify how achievement of early remission might influence outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we studied 220 consecutive adults with AML in first morphological remission who underwent transplantation after myeloablative or nonmyeloablative conditioning to investigate how the number of standard- or high-dose induction courses required to achieve remission impacted post-HCT outcome. Three-year estimates of overall survival were 65% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56% to 73%), 56% (95% CI, 43% to 67%), and 23% (95% CI, 6% to 46%) for patients requiring 1 course, 2 courses, or >2 courses of induction therapy; corresponding relapse estimates were 24% (95% CI, 17% to 31%), 43% (95% CI, 31% to 55%), and 58% (95% CI, 30% to 78%), respectively. After covariate adjustment (minimal residual disease status, conditioning, age, cytogenetic disease risk, type of consolidation chemotherapy, pre-HCT karyotype, and pre-HCT peripheral blood count recovery), the hazard ratios for 2 or >2 induction courses versus 1 induction were 1.16 (95% CI, .73 to 1.85, P = .53) and 2.63 (95% CI, 1.24 to 5.57, P = .011) for overall mortality, and 2.10 (95% CI, 1.27 to 3.48, P = .004) and 3.32 (95% CI, 1.42 to 7.78, P = .006), respectively, for relapse. These findings indicate that the number of induction courses required to achieve morphological remission in AML adds prognostic information for post-HCT outcome that is independent of other prognostic factors.

Citing Articles

Relationship between donor source, pre-transplant measurable residual disease, and outcome after allografting for adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Orvain C, Milano F, Rodriguez-Arboli E, Othus M, Petersdorf E, Sandmaier B Leukemia. 2024; 39(2):381-390.

PMID: 39668236 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02497-z.


Matched related versus unrelated versus haploidentical donors for allogeneic transplantation in AML patients achieving first complete remission after two induction courses: a study from the ALWP/EBMT.

Nagler A, Labopin M, Mielke S, Passweg J, Blaise D, Gedde-Dahl T Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023; 58(7):791-800.

PMID: 37045942 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-01980-y.


Association between Prior Cytotoxic Therapy, Antecedent Hematologic Disorder, and Outcome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Orvain C, Rodriguez-Arboli E, Othus M, Sandmaier B, Deeg H, Appelbaum F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36672303 PMC: 9856876. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020352.


Comparison of reduced intensity and nonmyeloablative conditioning for adults with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first or second remission.

Walter R, Sandmaier B, Othus M, Orvain C, Rodriguez-Arboli E, Oshima M Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022; 58(4):377-385.

PMID: 36577856 PMC: 10170527. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01909-x.


Impact of pre-transplant induction and consolidation cycles on AML allogeneic transplant outcomes: a CIBMTR analysis in 3113 AML patients.

Boyiadzis M, Zhang M, Chen K, Abdel-Azim H, Abid M, Aljurf M Leukemia. 2022; 37(5):1006-1017.

PMID: 36310182 PMC: 10148918. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01738-3.


References
1.
Buckley S, Appelbaum F, Walter R . Prognostic and therapeutic implications of minimal residual disease at the time of transplantation in acute leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 48(5):630-41. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.139. View

2.
Filipovich A, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard J, Lee S . National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005; 11(12):945-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004. View

3.
Cornelissen J, Gratwohl A, Schlenk R, Sierra J, Bornhauser M, Juliusson G . The European LeukemiaNet AML Working Party consensus statement on allogeneic HSCT for patients with AML in remission: an integrated-risk adapted approach. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012; 9(10):579-90. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.150. View

4.
Dohner H, Estey E, Amadori S, Appelbaum F, Buchner T, Burnett A . Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2009; 115(3):453-74. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358. View

5.
Arellano M, Pakkala S, Langston A, Tighiouart M, Pan L, Chen Z . Early clearance of peripheral blood blasts predicts response to induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2012; 118(21):5278-82. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27494. View