» Articles » PMID: 25276772

Highlighting the Structure-function Relationship of the Brain with the Ising Model and Graph Theory

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2014 Oct 3
PMID 25276772
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the advent of neuroimaging techniques, it becomes feasible to explore the structure-function relationships in the brain. When the brain is not involved in any cognitive task or stimulated by any external output, it preserves important activities which follow well-defined spatial distribution patterns. Understanding the self-organization of the brain from its anatomical structure, it has been recently suggested to model the observed functional pattern from the structure of white matter fiber bundles. Different models which study synchronization (e.g., the Kuramoto model) or global dynamics (e.g., the Ising model) have shown success in capturing fundamental properties of the brain. In particular, these models can explain the competition between modularity and specialization and the need for integration in the brain. Graphing the functional and structural brain organization supports the model and can also highlight the strategy used to process and organize large amount of information traveling between the different modules. How the flow of information can be prevented or partially destroyed in pathological states, like in severe brain injured patients with disorders of consciousness or by pharmacological induction like in anaesthesia, will also help us to better understand how global or integrated behavior can emerge from local and modular interactions.

Citing Articles

Energy of Functional Brain States Correlates With Cognition in Adolescent-Onset Schizophrenia and Healthy Persons.

Theis N, Bahuguna J, Rubin J, Banerjee S, Muldoon B, Prasad K Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(1):e70129.

PMID: 39777939 PMC: 11707705. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70129.


Criticality in Alzheimer's and healthy brains: insights from phase-ordering.

Palutla A, Seth S, Ashwin S, Krishnan M Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(4):1789-1797.

PMID: 39104675 PMC: 11297880. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-10033-5.


Diagnostically distinct resting state fMRI energy distributions: A subject-specific maximum entropy modeling study.

Theis N, Bahuguna J, Rubin J, Cape J, Iyengar S, Prasad K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38328170 PMC: 10849576. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.23.576937.


Brain Connectivity Signature Extractions from TMS Invoked EEGs.

Gupta D, Du X, Summerfelt A, Hong L, Choa F Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(8).

PMID: 37112420 PMC: 10146617. DOI: 10.3390/s23084078.


Critical transitions in degree mixed networks: A discovery of forbidden tipping regions in networked spin systems.

Reisinger D, Adam R, Kogler M, Fullsack M, Jager G PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277347.

PMID: 36399485 PMC: 9674165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277347.


References
1.
Honey C, Sporns O . Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008; 29(7):802-9. PMC: 6870962. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20579. View

2.
Friston K . Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(2):e33. PMC: 2642881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000033. View

3.
Hagmann P, Sporns O, Madan N, Cammoun L, Pienaar R, Wedeen V . White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(44):19067-72. PMC: 2973853. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009073107. View

4.
Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R . The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage. 2009; 58(2):296-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.036. View

5.
Rubinov M, Sporns O . Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2009; 52(3):1059-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003. View