» Articles » PMID: 25262383

A Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Social Constraints and Distress in Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal J Behav Med
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2014 Sep 29
PMID 25262383
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social constraints on cancer-related disclosure have been associated with increased distress among cancer patients. The goals of this meta-analysis were: (1) to quantify the average strength of the relationships between social constraints and general and cancer-specific distress in cancer patients; and (2) to examine potential moderators of these relationships. A literature search was conducted using electronic databases, and 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Moderate, significant relationships were found between social constraints and both general distress (r = 0.37, 95 % CI 0.31-0.43) and cancer-specific distress (r = 0.37, 95 % CI 0.31-0.44). The relationship between social constraints and cancer-specific distress was stronger for studies of patients who, on average, had been diagnosed more recently. Relationships between social constraints and both general and cancer-specific distress did not vary by age or gender. Findings suggest that social constraints may be important to target in interventions to reduce distress in cancer patients, especially those who have been recently diagnosed.

Citing Articles

Childhood cancer and parental mental health: role of disease severity, socioeconomic status, and social dynamics.

Ibrahim H, Ismail A, Rahim N, Iffland B, Neuner F BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):42.

PMID: 39825357 PMC: 11740337. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06494-z.


Relationship Functioning and Gut Microbiota Composition among Older Adult Couples.

Cheng Q, Krajmalnik-Brown R, DiBaise J, Maldonado J, Guest M, Todd M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(8).

PMID: 37107717 PMC: 10138905. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20085435.


Couple Communication in Cancer: Protocol for a Multi-Method Examination.

Langer S, Romano J, Keefe F, Baucom D, Strauman T, Syrjala K Front Psychol. 2022; 12:769407.

PMID: 35222142 PMC: 8865086. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769407.


Social constraints and cancer-related quality of life in single and partnered young adult testicular cancer survivors: a contextual approach.

Llave K, Hoyt M J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022; 40(6):743-755.

PMID: 35068347 PMC: 9308827. DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2021.2002995.


Contagious Health Risk and Precautionary Social Distancing.

Giese H, Gamp M, Stok F, Gaissmaier W, Schupp H, Renner B Front Psychol. 2021; 12:685134.

PMID: 34194375 PMC: 8236628. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685134.


References
1.
Brown L, Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, Tu W . The association of depression and anxiety with health-related quality of life in cancer patients with depression and/or pain. Psychooncology. 2009; 19(7):734-41. PMC: 2888919. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1627. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9, W64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. View

3.
Crawford J, Henry J . The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004; 43(Pt 3):245-65. DOI: 10.1348/0144665031752934. View

4.
Manne S . Intrusive thoughts and psychological distress among cancer patients: the role of spouse avoidance and criticism. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999; 67(4):539-46. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.4.539. View

5.
Hoyt M . Gender role conflict and emotional approach coping in men with cancer. Psychol Health. 2010; 24(8):981-96. DOI: 10.1080/08870440802311330. View