Validation of EORTC IN-PATSAT32 for Chinese Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Overview

Journal Patient Prefer Adherence

Date 2014 Sep 27

PMID 25258522

Citations 3

Authors

Jishui Zhang

Shumin Xie

Jiahao Liu

Weilin Sun

Hui Guo

Yingbin Hu

Xin Gao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To test the psychometric properties and applicability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire 32 (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) for Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Patients And Methods: A total of 106 inpatients with gastrointestinal cancer at Cangzhou Center Hospital were enrolled in this study. All were treated at Cangzhou Center Hospital from July 2013-March 2014. All participants self-administered the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 and EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

Results: The Cronbach's α coefficients were >0.70 for all scales of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all-item scale correlation coefficients met the standard of convergent validity, while only 50.0% met the standard of discriminant validity. A weak correlation was found between the scales and single items of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 and EORTC QLQ-C30.

Conclusion: The EORTC IN-PATSAT32 appears to be a reliable, valid, and acceptable instrument for measuring patient satisfaction among Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32.

Neijenhuijs K, Jansen F, Aaronson N, Bredart A, Groenvold M, Holzner B Support Care Cancer. 2018; 26(8):2551-2560.

PMID: 29732482 PMC: 6018571. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9.

Transcultural adaptation of the user satisfaction scale to the health service: Brazilian version of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire.

Gadelha B, Muzi C, Guimaraes R Clin Transl Oncol. 2017; 20(6):745-752.

PMID: 29086251 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1780-5.

Validation of EORTC IN-PATSAT 32 in Morocco: Methods and Processes.

Obtel M, Serhier Z, Bendahhou K, Bennani M, Zidouh A, Benider A Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017; 18(5):1403-1409.

PMID: 28612594 PMC: 5555554. DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.5.1403.

References

Oberst M . Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. Patients' perceptions of care. Measurement of quality and satisfaction. Cancer. 1984; 53(10 Suppl):2366-75. View

Loblaw D, Bezjak A, Singh P, Gotowiec A, Joubert D, Mah K . Psychometric refinement of an outpatient, visit-specific satisfaction with doctor questionnaire. Psychooncology. 2004; 13(4):223-34. DOI: 10.1002/pon.715. View

Draper M, Cohen P, Buchan H . Seeking consumer views: what use are results of hospital patient satisfaction surveys?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 13(6):463-8. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.463. View

Hjorleifsdottir E, Hallberg I, Gunnarsdottir E . Satisfaction with care in oncology outpatient clinics: psychometric characteristics of the Icelandic EORTC IN-PATSAT32 version. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(13-14):1784-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03095.x. View

Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. View

Loblaw D, Bezjak A, Bunston T . Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor Questionnaire. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(6):1931-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1931. View

Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby J, Conroy T, Coens C, Dhaese S . An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41(14):2120-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041. View

Defossez G, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Ingrand I, Gasquet I, Sifer-Riviere L, Ingrand P . Satisfaction with care among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: development and first steps of validation of the REPERES-60 questionnaire. BMC Cancer. 2007; 7:129. PMC: 1933545. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-129. View

Pascoe G . Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann. 1982; 6(3-4):185-210. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90002-2. View

10.

Arraras J, Vera R, Martinez M, Hernandez B, Lainez N, Rico M . The EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire: EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Validation study for Spanish patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009; 11(4):237-42. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-009-0346-6. View

11.

Wiggers J, Donovan K, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher R . Cancer patient satisfaction with care. Cancer. 1990; 66(3):610-6. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900801)66:3<610::aid-cncr2820660335>3.0.co;2-t. View

12.

Abetz L, Coombs J, Keininger D, Earle C, Wade C, Bury-Maynard D . Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: item generation and content validity testing. Value Health. 2005; 8 Suppl 1:S41-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00073.x. View

13.

Radwin L, Alster K, Rubin K . Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003; 30(2):283-90. DOI: 10.1188/03.ONF.283-290. View

14.

Guldvog B . Can patient satisfaction improve health among patients with angina pectoris?. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999; 11(3):233-40. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.233. View

15.

Sprangers M, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bjordal K, Blazeby J, Aaronson N . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7(4):291-300. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024977728719. View

16.

Yun Y, Kim S, Lee K, Park S, Lee C, Choi Y . Patient-reported assessment of quality care at end of life: development and validation of Quality Care Questionnaire-End of Life (QCQ-EOL). Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42(14):2310-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.010. View