» Articles » PMID: 25253578

[Brain Death Diagnosis After Sedation with Propofol or Sufentanil. Recommendations for the Usage of Toxicological Analytics]

Overview
Date 2014 Sep 26
PMID 25253578
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Before the clinical diagnosis of brain death is made, toxicological analyses are often performed for the exclusion of effective serum levels of previously applied sedating drugs. For propofol and sufentanil there are no uniform recommendations for the usage of toxicology test results.

Objectives: To develop a standard practice in the diagnosis of brain death after therapeutic application of one of these drugs.

Material And Methods: Based on the current literature and the available analytical assays, an ad hoc working group consisting of specialists in toxicology and intensive care medicine compiled recommendations for the usage of toxicological analytics in the diagnosis of brain death at the Rostock University Hospital.

Results: For propofol, current analytical assays allow the quantification of serum concentrations of 0.2 μg/ml and lower; the execution of clinical brain death diagnostics is recommended by the ad hoc group only at propofol serum levels lower than  0.4 μg/ml. For sufentanil, the currently prevalent assays set lower determination limits of about 0.2 ng/ml in serum and 0.1 ng/ml in urine, which is above the cautiously adopted lower therapeutic serum concentration of 0.02 ng/ml. Therefore after negative determination of sufentanil (< 0.2 ng/ml) in blood serum, the following alternative procedures are recommended: (1) the execution of clinical brain death diagnostics under administration of naloxone; or (2) at intact renal function the additional negative determination of sufentanil in urine (< 0.1 ng/ml). If an assay allowing the detection of sufentanil at ≤ 0.01 ng/ml is available, brain death diagnostics should be carried out only at a serum level lower than  0.02 ng/ml.

Conclusion: These recommendations may serve as a proposal for similar standards in other hospitals.

Citing Articles

Exclusive color-coded duplex sonography of extracranial vessels reliably confirms brain death: A prospective study.

Lambeck J, Strecker C, Niesen W, Bardutzky J Front Neurol. 2022; 13:992511.

PMID: 36212655 PMC: 9539749. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.992511.


"A Comparative Analysis of the Number of Organ Retrievals in Relation to Potential Donation Qualifications in Populations of Patients From a Single Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit in 2017-2018".

Kudlinski B, Trosiak M, Wojciech M, Zaborniak G, Kania J, Buczek A Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:930290.

PMID: 36059819 PMC: 9429814. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.930290.


[Brain death criterion and organ donation: current neuroscientific perspective].

Walter U Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020; 63(12):1519-1530.

PMID: 33180159 PMC: 7686223. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03245-1.

References
1.
Woestenborghs R, Timmerman P, Cornelissen M, Van Rompaey F, Gepts E, Camu F . Assay methods for sufentanil in plasma. Radioimmunoassay versus gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anesthesiology. 1994; 80(3):666-70. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199403000-00025. View

2.
Peters F, Jung J, Kraemer T, Maurer H . Fast, simple, and validated gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay for quantification of drugs relevant to diagnosis of brain death in human blood plasma samples. Ther Drug Monit. 2005; 27(3):334-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000158079.53577.46. View

3.
Hudson R, Bergstrom R, Thomson I, Sabourin M, Rosenbloom M, Strunin L . Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology. 1989; 70(3):426-31. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198903000-00011. View

4.
Harrer J, Nedelmann M, Eyding J, Ritter M, Schminke U, Schulte-Altedorneburg G . [Sonographic diagnostics in neurological emergency and intensive care medicine]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2012; 108(2):131-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-012-0146-6. View

5.
Wessen A, Persson P, Nilsson A, Hartvig P . Concentration-effect relationships of propofol after total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77(5):1000-7. View