» Articles » PMID: 25252834

Stepping in the Direction of the Fall: the Next Foot Placement Can Be Predicted from Current Upper Body State in Steady-state Walking

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Sep 26
PMID 25252834
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During human walking, perturbations to the upper body can be partly corrected by placing the foot appropriately on the next step. Here, we infer aspects of such foot placement dynamics using step-to-step variability over hundreds of steps of steady-state walking data. In particular, we infer dependence of the 'next' foot position on upper body state at different phases during the 'current' step. We show that a linear function of the hip position and velocity state (approximating the body center of mass state) during mid-stance explains over 80% of the next lateral foot position variance, consistent with (but not proving) lateral stabilization using foot placement. This linear function implies that a rightward pelvic deviation during a left stance results in a larger step width and smaller step length than average on the next foot placement. The absolute position on the treadmill does not add significant information about the next foot relative to current stance foot over that already available in the pelvis position and velocity. Such walking dynamics inference with steady-state data may allow diagnostics of stability and inform biomimetic exoskeleton or robot design.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Duo: Design and Validation of an Autonomous Frontal and Sagittal Actuating Hip Exoskeleton for Balance Modulation During Perturbed Locomotion.

Leestma J, Mathur S, Anderton M, Sawicki G, Young A IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2025; 9(5):3995-4002.

PMID: 40012859 PMC: 11864807. DOI: 10.1109/lra.2024.3371290.


Balance recovery schemes following mediolateral gyroscopic moment perturbations during walking.

Mohseni O, Mahmoudi A, Firouzi V, Seyfarth A, Vallery H, Sharbafi M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315414.

PMID: 39739770 PMC: 11687818. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315414.


Humans exploit the trade-off between lateral stability and manoeuvrability during walking.

Kulkarni R, Grover F, Shafer A, Schmitz X, Gordon K Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20242040.

PMID: 39657815 PMC: 11631486. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2040.


Prediction of Margin of Gait Stability by Using Six-DoF Motion of Pelvis.

Kuroda T, Okamoto S, Akiyama Y Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39599118 PMC: 11598456. DOI: 10.3390/s24227342.


Exploration-based learning of a stabilizing controller predicts locomotor adaptation.

Seethapathi N, Clark B, Srinivasan M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9498.

PMID: 39489737 PMC: 11532365. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53416-w.


References
1.
Revzen S, Guckenheimer J . Finding the dimension of slow dynamics in a rhythmic system. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 9(70):957-71. PMC: 3306634. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0431. View

2.
OConnor S, Kuo A . Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing. J Neurophysiol. 2009; 102(3):1411-9. PMC: 2746770. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00131.2009. View

3.
Hof A, Vermerris S, Gjaltema W . Balance responses to lateral perturbations in human treadmill walking. J Exp Biol. 2010; 213(Pt 15):2655-64. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.042572. View

4.
Bauby C, Kuo A . Active control of lateral balance in human walking. J Biomech. 2000; 33(11):1433-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00101-9. View

5.
Dingwell J, Cusumano J, Cavanagh P, Sternad D . Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech Eng. 2001; 123(1):27-32. DOI: 10.1115/1.1336798. View