» Articles » PMID: 25252795

Functionalization of Polycaprolactone Scaffolds with Hyaluronic Acid and β-TCP Facilitates Migration and Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells in Vitro

Abstract

In this study, we sought to assess the osteogenic potential of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) on three different polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds. The backbone structure of the scaffolds was manufactured by fused deposition modeling (PCL scaffold). The composition and morphology was functionalized in two of the scaffolds. The first underwent thermal induced phase separation of PCL infused into the pores of the PCL scaffold. This procedure resulted in a highly variable micro- and nanostructured porous (NSP), interconnected, and isotropic tubular morphology (NSP-PCL scaffold). The second scaffold type was functionalized by dip-coating the PCL scaffold with a mixture of hyaluronic acid and β-TCP (HT-PCL scaffold). The scaffolds were cylindrical and measured 5 mm in height and 10 mm in diameter. They were seeded with 1×10(6) human DPSCs, a cell type known to express bone-related markers, differentiate into osteoblasts-like cells, and to produce a mineralized bone-like extracellular matrix. DPSCs were phenotypically characterized by flow cytometry for CD90(+), CD73(+), CD105(+), and CD14(-). DNA, ALP, and Ca(2+) assays and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for genes involved in osteogenic differentiation were analyzed on day 1, 7, 14, and 21. Cell viability and distribution were assessed on day 1, 7, 14, and 21 by fluorescent-, scanning electron-, and confocal microscopy. The results revealed that the DPSCs expressed relevant gene expression consistent with osteogenic differentiation. The NSP-PCL and HT-PCL scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation and Ca(2+) deposition after 21 days of cultivation. Different gene expressions associated with mature osteoblasts were upregulated in these two scaffold types, suggesting that the methods in which the scaffolds promote osteogenic differentiation, depends on functionalization approaches. However, only the HT-PCL scaffold was also able to support cell proliferation and cell migration resulting in even cell dispersion throughout the scaffold. In conclusion, DPSCs could be a possible alternate cell source for bone tissue engineering. The HT-PCL scaffold showed promising results in terms of promoting cell migration and osteogenic differentiation, which warrants future in vivo studies.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of bone-protecting effects of palm carotene mixture in two- and three-dimensional osteoblast/osteoclast co-culture systems.

Yee M, Chin K, Ima-Nirwana S, Alias E, Chua K, Wong S Int J Med Sci. 2025; 22(3):585-603.

PMID: 39898246 PMC: 11783079. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.103445.


Engineering of Bioresorbable Polymers for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications.

Dobrzynska-Mizera M, Dodda J, Liu X, Knitter M, Oosterbeek R, Salinas P Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 13(30):e2401674.

PMID: 39233521 PMC: 11616265. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202401674.


Towards Stem Cell Therapy for Critical-Sized Segmental Bone Defects: Current Trends and Challenges on the Path to Clinical Translation.

Quek J, Vizetto-Duarte C, Teoh S, Choo Y J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38921519 PMC: 11205181. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15060145.


SiON Coating Regulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Antioxidant Capacity via Nuclear Erythroid Factor 2 Activity under Toxic Oxidative Stress Conditions.

Ahuja N, Awad K, Yang S, Dong H, Mikos A, Aswath P Antioxidants (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38397787 PMC: 10885901. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13020189.


Isolation and characterization of apical papilla cells from root end of human third molar and their differentiation into cementoblast cells: an in vitro study.

Ebadi M, Miresmaeili A, Rajabi S, Shojaei S, Farhadi S Biol Proced Online. 2023; 25(1):2.

PMID: 36690939 PMC: 9869574. DOI: 10.1186/s12575-023-00190-6.


References
1.
Gronthos S, Brahim J, Li W, Fisher L, Cherman N, Boyde A . Stem cell properties of human dental pulp stem cells. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(8):531-5. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100806. View

2.
Lutolf M, Hubbell J . Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23(1):47-55. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1055. View

3.
Perry B, Zhou D, Wu X, Yang F, Byers M, Chu T . Collection, cryopreservation, and characterization of human dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells for banking and clinical use. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2008; 14(2):149-56. PMC: 2963629. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0031. View

4.
Derby B . Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science. 2012; 338(6109):921-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1226340. View

5.
Hutmacher D, Schantz T, Zein I, Ng K, Teoh S, Tan K . Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 55(2):203-16. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.0.co;2-7. View