» Articles » PMID: 25251755

Self-reported and Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2014 Sep 25
PMID 25251755
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Most estimates of physical activity (PA) patterns in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are based on subjective self-report measures prone to error. The aims of this study were to obtain objective measurements of PA using an accelerometer and estimates of energy expenditure based on the self-reported International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and to describe their relationship.

Methods: The Activity in Lupus To Energize and Renew study, a cross-sectional study of PA, included 129 persons with SLE. Accelerometer measures >7 days included total daily activity counts and minutes of moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA). Each person completed the IPAQ via telephone interview. Spearman's correlations (r) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) assessed associations between accelerometer and IPAQ.

Results: Daily PA means and SDs from accelerometer measures were 502,910 ± 118,755 for total daily activity counts and 40 ± 30 minutes for MVPA. The median (interquartile range) MET minutes/day for IPAQ intensities were: 400 (159-693) for total; 83 (26-184) for walking; and 231 (77-514) for MVPA, and domains were: 0 (0-73) for work; 28 (0-85) for active transportation; 77 (26-231) for domestic and garden; and 57 (0-213) for leisure. Associations between accelerometer measures and IPAQ were 1) total daily count versus IPAQ total: r = 0.21 (95% CI 0.03, 0.37) and 2) MVPA versus IPAQ moderate-vigorous: r = 0.16 (95% CI - 230.02, 0.33).

Conclusion: Accelerometer measures and IPAQ energy expenditure estimates were moderately correlated. IPAQ provided descriptive PA data, whereas accelerometers captured all daily activities, which can help assess guideline attainment. The choice of IPAQ versus accelerometer measure should include considering the purpose for which PA is measured.

Citing Articles

Exercise as adjunctive therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Frade S, ONeill S, Greene D, Nutter E, Cameron M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 4:CD014816.

PMID: 37073886 PMC: 10115181. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014816.pub2.


Investigating the role of health information technology in the control and management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): a systematic review.

Moulaei K, Rajaei E, Ahmadian L, Khajouei R BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):264.

PMID: 36209161 PMC: 9547570. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02009-y.


Motivational interviewing intervention for increasing physical activity and improving dietary behaviors: The Lupus Intervention Fatigue Trial protocol.

Kinnett-Hopkins D, Ehrlich-Jones L, Chmiel J, Chung A, Erickson D, Semanik P Contemp Clin Trials. 2022; 114:106690.

PMID: 35091136 PMC: 10317466. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106690.


Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review.

Doma K, Speyer R, Parsons L, Cordier R BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):43.

PMID: 30823873 PMC: 6396466. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0684-1.


Self-Reported Physical Activity Is Associated with Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from KORean Lupus Network (KORNET) Registry.

Kim S, Choe J, Lee S Yonsei Med J. 2018; 59(7):857-864.

PMID: 30091319 PMC: 6082985. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.7.857.


References
1.
Farr J, Going S, Lohman T, Rankin L, Kasle S, Cornett M . Physical activity levels in patients with early knee osteoarthritis measured by accelerometry. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(9):1229-36. PMC: 2595140. DOI: 10.1002/art.24007. View

2.
Volkmann E, Grossman J, Sahakian L, Skaggs B, FitzGerald J, Ragavendra N . Low physical activity is associated with proinflammatory high-density lipoprotein and increased subclinical atherosclerosis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010; 62(2):258-65. PMC: 2853476. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20076. View

3.
Rosemann T, Kuehlein T, Laux G, Szecsenyi J . Osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a comparison of factors associated with physical activity. Clin Rheumatol. 2007; 26(11):1811-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-007-0579-0. View

4.
Kaminsky L, Ozemek C . A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions. Physiol Meas. 2012; 33(11):1869-76. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1869. View

5.
Welk G, Schaben J, Morrow Jr J . Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(9):1637-45. View