» Articles » PMID: 25247946

MRI Findings After Prostatic Artery Embolization for Treatment of Benign Hyperplasia

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2014 Sep 24
PMID 25247946
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this article is to assess and describe the MRI findings after prostatic artery embolization for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 17 patients who underwent prostatic artery embolization as part of different prospective studies to evaluate this alternative treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical results were evaluated by assessment of urinary catheterization and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Serial MRI examinations were performed, and the prostatic central gland and peripheral zone were evaluated for signal intensity changes and the presence and characteristics of infarcted areas. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA for repeated measures and Student t test.

Results: All patients had clinical success, as defined by the removal of indwelling urinary catheter or decreased IPSS after embolization. Infarcts were seen in 70.6% of the subjects, exclusively in the central gland, were almost always characterized by hyperintensity on T1-weighted images and predominant hypointensity on T2-weighted images, and became smaller (mean reduction, p < 0.001) and isointense to the remaining of the central gland over time. Volume reduction of the prostate after embolization was significant (averaging 32.0% after 12-18 months; p < 0.001) only in patients with infarcts. No statistically significant association was seen between the development of infarcts and IPSS.

Conclusion: MRI can be used for assessing the development of infarcts and volume reduction in the prostate after embolization. Further studies are needed to correlate these findings to clinical outcome.

Citing Articles

Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Beyond Adenocarcinoma - Anatomical Variations, Mimickers, and Post-Intervention Changes.

Yilmaz E, Esengur O, Gelikman D, Turkbey B Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2024; 46(1):2-30.

PMID: 39580037 PMC: 11741936. DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2024.11.001.


Analysis of the efficacy of Prostatic Artery Embolization in the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Lin J, Luo J, Fang Z Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39460800 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04650-9.


Ischemic penile necrosis following embolization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A case report.

El Omri G, Taghouan A, Rais H, Houry Y, Rachid M, Cherkaoui Jaouad M Urol Case Rep. 2024; 55:102783.

PMID: 39036287 PMC: 11260300. DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102783.


A correlation study between prostate necrosis rate calculated by 3D Slicer software and clinical efficacy of prostatic artery embolization, along with an analysis of predictors of clinical success after prostatic artery embolization.

Wang R, Lin F, Ruan D, Li S, Zhou Y, Luo J Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 49(3):927-938.

PMID: 38158423 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04131-5.


Influence of benign prostatic hyperplasia patterns detected with MRI on the clinical outcome after prostatic artery embolization.

Boschheidgen M, Al-Monajjed R, Minko P, Jannusch K, Ullrich T, Radke K CVIR Endovasc. 2023; 6(1):9.

PMID: 36859572 PMC: 9978045. DOI: 10.1186/s42155-023-00357-y.