» Articles » PMID: 25245594

[Chronic Pain, Pain Disease, and Satisfaction of Patients with Pain Treatment in Germany. Results of a Representative Population Survey]

Overview
Journal Schmerz
Date 2014 Sep 24
PMID 25245594
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are only few data from representative samples of the general German population on the prevalence of a "pain disease" and on satisfaction with pain therapy of persons with chronic pain available.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey with people aged ≥ 14 years representative for the German population was conducted in 2013. Measures were obtained for presence of chronic pain (based on the definition of the International Association for the Study of Pain) and for "pain disease" by the presence of disabling pain in the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire and increased psychological distress in the Patient Health Questionnaire 4. In case of chronic pain reports, the satisfaction with current pain treatment and current treatment by a pain specialist were assessed.

Results: Responses were received from 2508 (57.5 %) of the 4360 people contacted. The prevalence of chronic pain was 26.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 25.2-28.6 %]. A total of 7.4 % (95 % CI 5.0-9.9 %) met the criteria for chronic disabling nonmalignant pain, while 2.8 % (95 % CI 2.2-3.4 %) of participants met the criteria of a pain disease. In all, 31.9 % of persons with disabling pain reported current treatment by a pain specialist and 33.1 % of persons with disabling pain were (very) dissatisfied with current pain treatment. Treatment by a pain specialist was associated with higher health care use and lower treatment satisfaction.

Conclusion: There is a need to improve the care of persons with chronic disabling pain. Whether pain specialist treatment is (cost) effective in chronic disabling pain needs to be examined by longitudinal studies.

Citing Articles

Understanding General Practitioner and Patient Perceptions Regarding Integration of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Management-A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study in the RELIEF Project.

Poss-Doering R, Carter S, Brinkmoller S, Mohler M, Dupont D, Paul C Diseases. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997041 PMC: 11854548. DOI: 10.3390/diseases13020034.


Exploring Physician and Patient Perspectives on Expectations and Role Models Towards Chronic Pain Treatment in General Practice: A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study.

Dupont D, Brinkmoller S, Carter S, Wensing M, Strassner C, Engeser P Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39857214 PMC: 11764803. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13020187.


[Opioid prescriptions for insured individuals without cancer in Germany: data from the BARMER].

Lappe V, Grandt D, Marschall U, Petzke F, Hauser W, Schubert I Schmerz. 2024; .

PMID: 39636418 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-024-00852-8.


[Professional development and job satisfaction in pain medicine].

Erlenwein J, Kube B, Boujong D, Nadstawek J, Huppe M, Jurgens T Schmerz. 2024; .

PMID: 39630248 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-024-00851-9.


[Current knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students on pain and the influence of a teaching intervention].

Bassimtabar A, Alfuth M Schmerz. 2024; .

PMID: 39340694 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-024-00832-y.


References
1.
Moynihan R, Doran E, Henry D . Disease mongering is now part of the global health debate. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(5):e106. PMC: 2689668. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050106. View

2.
Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkin S . Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992; 50(2):133-149. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4. View

3.
Muller-Schwefe G . European survey of chronic pain patients: results for Germany. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011; 27(11):2099-106. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.621935. View

4.
. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl. 1986; 3:S1-226. View

5.
Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J, Lowe B . An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009; 50(6):613-21. DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613. View