» Articles » PMID: 25237711

The Relationship Between Upper Airways and Craniofacial Morphology Studied in 3D. A CBCT Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Sep 20
PMID 25237711
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether morphology and dimension of the upper airway differ between patients characterized by various craniofacial morphology.

Setting And Sample Population: Ninety young adult patients from the Postgraduate Clinic, Section of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Health, Aarhus University, Denmark, with no obvious signs of respiratory diseases and no previous adeno-tonsillectomy procedures. Thirty patients were characterized as Class I (-0.5 < ANB < 4.5), 30 as Class II (ANB > 4.5), and 30 as Class III (ANB < -0.5).

Material And Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained in a supine position for all patients. Cephalometric landmarks were identified in 3D. Sagittal and transversal dimensions, cross sections, and partial and total volumes of the upper airway were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in all three planes of space. The cross-sectional minimal area of the upper airway was assessed as well.

Results: No statistical significant relationships between dimension and morphology of upper airways and skeletal malocclusion were found.

Conclusion: Differences in craniofacial morphology as identified by the sagittal jaw relationship were not correlated with variation in upper airway volumes. A clinical significant relation was detected between minimal area and total upper airway volume.

Citing Articles

Ten Years of Cone-Beam CT Airway Studies on Their Relationship with Different Anteroposterior Skeletal Patterns: A Systematic Review.

Saccucci M, Fioravanti M, Pasqualini A, Vozza I, Luzzi V, Ierardo G Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942397 PMC: 11817281. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030208.


Upper airway dimensions and craniofacial morphology: A correlation study using cone beam computed tomography.

Carvalho A, Pollmann M, Martins E Korean J Orthod. 2024; 54(5):274-283.

PMID: 39128860 PMC: 11422678. DOI: 10.4041/kjod23.206.


Three-Dimensional Assessment of Upper Airway Volume and Morphology in Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns.

Pop S, Procopciuc A, Arsintescu B, Mitariu M, Mitariu L, Pop R Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38732317 PMC: 11083622. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090903.


Does Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Influence Upper Airway in Adult Patients? A Scoping Review.

Benetti M, Montresor L, Cantarella D, Zerman N, Spinas E Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38534284 PMC: 10969306. DOI: 10.3390/dj12030060.


Upper Airway Dimensions among Different Skeletal Malocclusions: A Retrospective Observational Study by Cephalometric Analysis.

Sfondrini M, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Gandini P, Roncoroni C, Scribante A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38248220 PMC: 10813941. DOI: 10.3390/dj12010012.