» Articles » PMID: 25232263

Otilonium Bromide in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Dose-ranging Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2014 Sep 19
PMID 25232263
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To examine the efficacy and safety of otilonium bromide (OB) in treatment-sensitive functional irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) clinical parameters.

Methods: Ninety-three patients (44.8 ± 12.6 years, 69% female) with IBS symptoms complying with Rome II criteria participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, dose-ranging phase I/II study. Patients were administered OB 20 mg (n = 24), 40 mg (n = 23) and 80 mg (n = 23) tid or placebo (n = 23) in 4 parallel groups for 4 wk. Primary efficacy variables included abdominal discomfort, intestinal habits, number of daily evacuations and stool consistency. Secondary efficacy measures included return to regular intestinal habits and global discomfort. Safety was also assessed.

Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar among the 4 groups. Although individual parameters such as intensity and frequency of abdominal discomfort, bloating or pain were reduced by OB over the 4 wk, no significant differences were observed between groups. Similarly, no difference was observed between OB treatment or placebo for mucus in stool and incomplete or difficulty of evacuation. However, evacuation frequency was significantly reduced after 4 wk by 80 mg OB compared to placebo (-8.36% for placebo vs -41.9% for 80 mg OB, P < 0.01). While 21.7% of patients in the placebo group experienced regular intestinal habits after 4 wk, this improvement was greater for patients treated with 40 mg OB (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Furthermore, a dose-dependent reduction in frequency of diarrhoea (χ(2)-test for trend = 11.5, P < 0.001) and an increase in normal stool frequency was observed. Combining individual variables into a global discomfort index revealed significant improvement among increasing OB doses, favouring 40 mg (P = 0.013) and 80 mg OB (P = 0.001) over placebo. No difference was observed between frequency of adverse events for placebo vs OB.

Conclusion: This dose-ranging study demonstrates that OB at 40 and 80 mg can improve individual and global clinical symptoms of IBS compared to placebo over a 4-wk period.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of acupuncture in refractory irritable bowel syndrome patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Zhao J, Zheng H, Wang X, Wang X, Shi Y, Xie C Front Med. 2024; 18(4):678-689.

PMID: 38958923 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-024-1073-7.


Irritable bowel syndrome: Epidemiology, overlap disorders, pathophysiology and treatment.

Huang K, Wang F, Lv M, Ma X, Tang X, Lv L World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(26):4120-4135.

PMID: 37475846 PMC: 10354571. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i26.4120.


Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options.

Brenner D, Lacy B Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116(8):1587-1600.

PMID: 33993133 PMC: 8315189. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001266.


Effect of Samryungbaekchul-san Combined with Otilonium Bromide on Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lee J, Kim J, Baeg M, Sunwoo Y, Do K, Lee J J Clin Med. 2019; 8(10).

PMID: 31569833 PMC: 6832362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101558.


Effect of herbal extract granules combined with otilonium bromide on irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Kim J, Kim P, Lee J, Kim Y, Yang N, Baeg M BMJ Open. 2017; 7(11):e018362.

PMID: 29196484 PMC: 5719308. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018362.


References
1.
Martinez-Cutillas M, Gil V, Gallego D, Mane N, Martin M, Jimenez M . Mechanisms of action of otilonium bromide (OB) in human cultured smooth muscle cells and rat colonic strips. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25(12):e803-12. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12206. View

2.
Drossman D . Review article: an integrated approach to the irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999; 13 Suppl 2:3-14. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.0130s2003.x. View

3.
Sperber A, Shvartzman P, Friger M, Fich A . A comparative reappraisal of the Rome II and Rome III diagnostic criteria: are we getting closer to the 'true' prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 19(6):441-7. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32801140e2. View

4.
Thompson W, Longstreth G, Drossman D, Heaton K, Irvine E, Muller-Lissner S . Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut. 1999; 45 Suppl 2:II43-7. PMC: 1766683. DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.2008.ii43. View

5.
Mearin F, Badia X, Balboa A, Baro E, Caldwell E, Cucala M . Irritable bowel syndrome prevalence varies enormously depending on the employed diagnostic criteria: comparison of Rome II versus previous criteria in a general population. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001; 36(11):1155-61. DOI: 10.1080/00365520152584770. View