» Articles » PMID: 25228079

Validation of the Endopep-MS Method for Qualitative Detection of Active Botulinum Neurotoxins in Human and Chicken Serum

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2014 Sep 18
PMID 25228079
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are highly toxic proteases produced by anaerobic bacteria. Traditionally, a mouse bioassay (MBA) has been used for detection of BoNTs, but for a long time, laboratories have worked with alternative methods for their detection. One of the most promising in vitro methods is a combination of an enzymatic and mass spectrometric assay called Endopep-MS. However, no comprehensive validation of the method has been presented. The main purpose of this work was to perform a validation for the qualitative analysis of BoNT-A, B, C, C/D, D, D/C, and F in serum. The limit of detection (LOD), selectivity, precision, stability in matrix and solution, and correlation with the MBA were evaluated. The LOD was equal to or even better than that of the MBA for BoNT-A, B, D/C, E, and F. Furthermore, Endopep-MS was for the first time successfully used to differentiate between BoNT-C and D and their mosaics C/D and D/C by different combinations of antibodies and target peptides. In addition, sequential antibody capture was presented as a new way to multiplex the method when only a small sample volume is available. In the comparison with the MBA, all the samples analyzed were positive for BoNT-C/D with both methods. These results indicate that the Endopep-MS method is a valid alternative to the MBA as the gold standard for BoNT detection based on its sensitivity, selectivity, and speed and that it does not require experimental animals.

Citing Articles

Single-Domain Antibody Multimers for Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin Serotypes C, D, and Their Mosaics in Endopep-MS.

Harmsen M, Cornelissen J, van der Wal F, Bergervoet J, Koene M Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37755999 PMC: 10535107. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15090573.


type C, D, C/D, and D/C: An update.

Meurens F, Carlin F, Federighi M, Filippitzi M, Fournier M, Fravalo P Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1099184.

PMID: 36687640 PMC: 9849819. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1099184.


New approach for the rational selection of markers to identify botulinum toxins.

Rosen O, Feldberg L, Dor E, Zichel R Arch Toxicol. 2021; 95(4):1503-1516.

PMID: 33569691 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-02996-3.


Toxemia in Human Naturally Acquired Botulism.

Rasetti-Escargueil C, Lemichez E, Popoff M Toxins (Basel). 2020; 12(11).

PMID: 33202855 PMC: 7697460. DOI: 10.3390/toxins12110716.


Modification and validation of the Endopep-mass spectrometry method for botulinum neurotoxin detection in liver samples with application to samples collected during animal botulism outbreaks.

Tevell Aberg A, Karlsson I, Hedeland M Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020; 413(2):345-354.

PMID: 33119784 PMC: 7806574. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-03001-z.


References
1.
Notermans S, Dufrenne J, Kozaki S . Experimental botulism in Pekin ducks. Avian Dis. 1980; 24(3):658-64. View

2.
Moura H, Terilli R, Woolfitt A, Gallegos-Candela M, McWilliams L, Solano M . Studies on botulinum neurotoxins type /C1 and mosaic/DC using Endopep-MS and proteomics. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011; 61(3):288-300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00774.x. View

3.
Tevell Aberg A, Bjornstad K, Hedeland M . Mass spectrometric detection of protein-based toxins. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013; 11 Suppl 1:S215-26. DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0072. View

4.
Woudstra C, Skarin H, Anniballi F, Auricchio B, De Medici D, Bano L . Validation of a real-time PCR based method for detection of Clostridium botulinum types C, D and their mosaic variants C-D and D-C in a multicenter collaborative trial. Anaerobe. 2013; 22:31-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.05.002. View

5.
Dorner M, Schulz K, Kull S, Dorner B . Complexity of botulinum neurotoxins: challenges for detection technology. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012; 364:219-55. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33570-9_11. View