» Articles » PMID: 25227258

O Father Where Art Thou? Paternity Analyses in a Natural Population of the Haploid-diploid Seaweed Chondrus Crispus

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Sep 18
PMID 25227258
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The link between life history traits and mating systems in diploid organisms has been extensively addressed in the literature, whereas the degree of selfing and/or inbreeding in natural populations of haploid-diploid organisms, in which haploid gametophytes alternate with diploid sporophytes, has been rarely measured. Dioecy has often been used as a proxy for the mating system in these organisms. Yet, dioecy does not prevent the fusion of gametes from male and female gametophytes originating from the same sporophyte. This is likely a common occurrence when spores from the same parent are dispersed in clumps and recruit together. This pattern of clumped spore dispersal has been hypothesized to explain significant heterozygote deficiency in the dioecious haploid-diploid seaweed Chondrus crispus. Fronds and cystocarps (structures in which zygotes are mitotically amplified) were sampled in two 25 m(2) plots located within a high and a low intertidal zone and genotyped at 5 polymorphic microsatellite loci in order to explore the mating system directly using paternity analyses. Multiple males sired cystocarps on each female, but only one of the 423 paternal genotypes corresponded to a field-sampled gametophyte. Nevertheless, larger kinship coefficients were detected between males siring cystocarps on the same female in comparison with males in the entire population, confirming restricted spermatial and clumped spore dispersal. Such dispersal mechanisms may be a mode of reproductive assurance due to nonmotile gametes associated with putatively reduced effects of inbreeding depression because of the free-living haploid stage in C. crispus.

Citing Articles

Population genetics of the freshwater red alga Batrachospermum gelatinosum (Rhodophyta) I: Frequent intragametophytic selfing in a monoicous, haploid-diploid species.

Shainker-Connelly S, Crowell R, Stoeckel S, Vis M, Krueger-Hadfield S J Phycol. 2024; 60(6):1420-1436.

PMID: 39466068 PMC: 11670298. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13510.


Evolution of parental care in haploid-diploid plants.

Bessho K, Sasaki A Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2016):20232351.

PMID: 38351800 PMC: 10865002. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2351.


Sexual selection in seaweed? Testing Bateman's principles in the red alga .

Lavaut E, Valero M, Mauger S, Guillemin M, Destombe C, Dufay M Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2006):20231668.

PMID: 37700657 PMC: 10498045. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1668.


Dispersal, kin aggregation, and the fitness consequences of not spreading sibling larvae.

Burgess S, Powell J, Bueno M Ecology. 2022; 104(1):e3858.

PMID: 36059232 PMC: 10078279. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3858.


The Contribution of Clonality to Population Genetic Structure in the Sea Anemone, Diadumene lineata.

Ryan W, Aida J, Krueger-Hadfield S J Hered. 2021; 112(1):122-139.

PMID: 33507264 PMC: 8355472. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esaa050.


References
1.
Krueger-Hadfield S, Kubler J, Dudgeon S . Reproductive effort of (Rhodophyta) along the California coast. J Phycol. 2013; 49(2):271-281. PMC: 3678391. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12034. View

2.
Peakall R, Smouse P . GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(19):2537-9. PMC: 3463245. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. View

3.
Krueger-Hadfield S, Collen J, Daguin-Thiebaut C, Valero M . GENETIC POPULATION STRUCTURE AND MATING SYSTEM IN CHONDRUS CRISPUS (RHODOPHYTA). J Phycol. 2016; 47(3):440-450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00995.x. View

4.
Billiard S, Lopez-Villavicencio M, Hood M, Giraud T . Sex, outcrossing and mating types: unsolved questions in fungi and beyond. J Evol Biol. 2012; 25(6):1020-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02495.x. View

5.
Crawford M, Jesson L, Garnock-Jones P . Correlated evolution of sexual system and life-history traits in mosses. Evolution. 2009; 63(5):1129-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00615.x. View