» Articles » PMID: 25223820

MRI-based Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis: Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Magnetic Resonance Elastography

Overview
Date 2014 Sep 17
PMID 25223820
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the use of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for staging hepatic fibrosis, and compare its staging ability with that of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Materials And Methods: This study included 129 patients with pathologically staged liver fibrosis, and 53 patients with healthy livers. All patients underwent both MRE and IVIM imaging. Four diffusivity indices were calculated with 11 b-values; slow diffusion coefficient related to molecular diffusion (D), fast diffusion coefficient related to perfusion in micro-vessels (D*), perfusion-related diffusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of IVIM imaging and MRE for staging hepatic fibrosis.

Results: D*, f, and ADC values decreased significantly with fibrosis stage (P < 0.0124), and liver stiffness increased (P < 0.0001). The Az value of MRE was significantly higher than that of D* for all fibrosis stages (D* vs. MRE for ≥ F1, 0.851 vs. 0.992 [P < 0.0001]; ≥ F2, 0.898 vs. 0.998 [P = 0.0003]; ≥ F3, 0.904 vs. 0.995 [P = 0.0004]; F4, 0.885 vs. 0.996 [P < 0.0001]).

Conclusion: IVIM imaging is a useful technique for evaluating hepatic fibrosis, but MRE is better able to discriminate fibrosis stages than IVIM imaging.

Citing Articles

Prospective characterization of intestinal MRI intravoxel incoherent motion in pediatric and young adult patients with newly diagnosed small bowel Crohn's disease.

Alves V, Mahalingam N, Tkach J, Towbin A, Imbus R, Denson L Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(10):3325-3336.

PMID: 38724774 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04318-4.


Combining T1rho and advanced diffusion MRI for noninvasively staging liver fibrosis: an experimental study in rats.

Guo Y, Guo T, Huang C, Sun P, Wu Z, Jin Z Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(6):1881-1891.

PMID: 38607572 PMC: 11213740. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04327-3.


Interpretation, Reporting, and Clinical Applications of Liver MR Elastography.

Moura Cunha G, Fan B, Navin P, Olivie D, Venkatesh S, Ehman R Radiology. 2024; 310(3):e231220.

PMID: 38470236 PMC: 10982829. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231220.


Intravoxel incoherent motion assessment of liver fibrosis staging in MASLD.

Ren H, Xu H, Yang D, Tong X, Zhao X, Wang Q Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(5):1411-1418.

PMID: 38461432 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04207-w.


Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients.

Arakane T, Okada M, Nakazawa Y, Tago K, Yoshikawa H, Mizuno M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37892021 PMC: 10605488. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203200.