» Articles » PMID: 25221608

Translating Personalized Medicine Using New Genetic Technologies in Clinical Practice: the Ethical Issues

Overview
Journal Per Med
Date 2014 Sep 16
PMID 25221608
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The integration of new genetic technologies into clinical practice holds great promise for the personalization of medical care, particularly the use of large-scale DNA sequencing for genome-wide genetic testing. However, these technologies also yield unprecedented amounts of information whose clinical implications are not fully understood, and we are still developing technical standards for measuring sequence accuracy. These technical and clinical challenges raise ethical issues that are similar to but qualitatively different from those that we are accustomed to dealing with for traditional medical genetics. The sheer amount of information afforded by genome sequencing requires rethinking of how to implement core ethical principles including, but not limited to: informed consent, privacy and data ownership and sharing, technology regulation, issues of access, particularly as new technology is integrated into clinical practice, and issues of potential stigma and impact on perceptions of disability. In this article, we will review the issues of informed consent, privacy, data ownership and technology regulation as they relate to the emerging field of personalized medicine and genomics.

Citing Articles

The Use of Big Data in Personalized Healthcare to Reduce Inventory Waste and Optimize Patient Treatment.

Badr Y, Abdul Kader L, Shamayleh A J Pers Med. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38673011 PMC: 11051308. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040383.


A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Variations in Collagen-Encoding Genes and Their Implications in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Goel S, Deshpande S, Dhaniwala N, Singh R, Suneja A, Jadawala V Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52708.

PMID: 38384607 PMC: 10880043. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52708.


Healthcare practice strategies for integrating personalized medicine: Management of COVID-19.

Liu W, Chien C, Tung T World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9(29):8647-8657.

PMID: 34734043 PMC: 8546804. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8647.


Engaging pharmacogenomics in pain management and opioid selection.

Bright D, Petry N, Roath E, Gibb T Pharmacogenomics. 2021; 22(14):927-937.

PMID: 34521258 PMC: 8656342. DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0044.


Practicality of 3D Printed Personalized Medicines in Therapeutics.

Amekyeh H, Tarlochan F, Billa N Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:646836.

PMID: 33912058 PMC: 8072378. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.646836.


References
1.
Ormond K, Cirino A, Helenowski I, Chisholm R, Wolf W . Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A. 2009; 149A(2):188-98. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32635. View

2.
Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau T . Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet. 2001; 38(8):519-26. PMC: 1734924. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.38.8.519. View

3.
Borry P, van Hellemondt R, Sprumont D, Jales C, Rial-Sebbag E, Spranger T . Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012; 20(7):715-21. PMC: 3376265. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.278. View

4.
Kaye J . The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17(R2):R180-3. PMC: 2672785. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn253. View

5.
Green R, Berg J, Berry G, Biesecker L, Dimmock D, Evans J . Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Genet Med. 2012; 14(4):405-10. PMC: 3763716. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.21. View