» Articles » PMID: 25218308

Identifying Profiles of Recovery from Reward Devaluation in Rats

Overview
Journal Behav Brain Res
Date 2014 Sep 15
PMID 25218308
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In humans and other mammals, the unexpected loss of a resource can lead to emotional conflict. Consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) is a laboratory model of reward devaluation meant to capture that conflict. In this paradigm, animals are exposed to a sharp reduction in the sucrose concentration of a solution after several days of access. This downshift in sucrose content leads to behavioral responses such as the suppression of consumption and physiologic responses including elevation of corticosterone levels. However, response heterogeneity in cSNC has yet to be explored and may be relevant for increasing the validity of this model, as humans demonstrate clinically meaningful heterogeneity in response to resource loss. The current analysis applied latent growth mixture modeling to test for and characterize heterogeneity in recovery from cSNC among rats (N=262). Although most animals exhibited recovery of consummatory behavior after a sharp drop in consumption in the first postshift trial (Recovery class; 83%), two additional classes were identified including animals that did not change their consumption levels after downshift (No Contrast class; 6%), and animals that exhibited an initial response similar to that of the Recovery class but did not recover to preshift consumption levels (No Recovery class; 11%). These results indicate heterogeneity in recovery from reward loss among rats, which may increase the translatability of this animal model to understand diverse responses to loss among humans.

Citing Articles

Frustrative Nonreward: Behavior, Circuits, Neurochemistry, and Disorders.

Papini M, Green T, Marmol Contreras Y, Torres C, Ogawa M, Li Z J Neurosci. 2024; 44(40).

PMID: 39358023 PMC: 11450524. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1021-24.2024.


Evidence of successive negative contrast in terrestrial toads (Rhinella arenarum): central or peripheral effect?.

Muzio R, Yohena A, Papini M Anim Cogn. 2022; 25(6):1453-1460.

PMID: 35612651 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01626-4.


Incentive disengagement and the adaptive significance of frustrative nonreward.

Papini M, Guarino S, Hagen C, Torres C Learn Behav. 2022; 50(3):372-388.

PMID: 35237945 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-022-00519-3.


Attachment Styles, Personality, and Frustration Intolerance.

Schetsche C, Mustaca A Health Psychol Res. 2022; 9(1):24551.

PMID: 35106393 PMC: 8801765. DOI: 10.52965/001c.24551.


Variation of the human mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1) gene predicts vulnerability to frustration.

Daniel A, Rushing B, Tapia Menchaca K Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21840.

PMID: 33318511 PMC: 7736895. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78783-4.


References
1.
Manzo L, Gomez M, Callejas-Aguilera J, Fernandez-Teruel A, Papini M, Torres C . Anti-anxiety self-medication induced by incentive loss in rats. Physiol Behav. 2013; 123:86-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.10.002. View

2.
Mitchell C, Flaherty C . Temporal dynamics of corticosterone elevation in successive negative contrast. Physiol Behav. 1998; 64(3):287-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00072-9. View

3.
Hobfoll S . Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989; 44(3):513-24. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513. View

4.
Ortega L, Glueck A, Daniel A, Prado-Rivera M, White M, Papini M . Memory interfering effects of chlordiazepoxide on consummatory successive negative contrast. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013; 116:96-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.11.031. View

5.
Nikiforuk A, Popik P . Antidepressants alleviate the impact of reinforcer downshift. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008; 19(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.08.002. View