Characterizing Preclinical Models of Ischemic Heart Failure: Differences Between LAD and LCx Infarctions

Large animal studies are an important step toward clinical translation of novel therapeutic approaches. We aimed to establish an ischemic heart failure (HF) model with a larger myocardial infarction (MI) relative to previous studies, and characterize the functional and structural features of this model. An MI was induced by occluding the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD; n = 15) or the proximal left circumflex artery (LCx; n = 6) in Yorkshire pigs. Three pigs with sham procedures were also included. All pigs underwent hemodynamic and echocardiographic assessments before MI, at 1 mo, and 3 mo after MI. Analyses of left ventricular (LV) myocardial mechanics by means of strains and torsion were performed using speckle-tracking echocardiography and compared between the groups. The proximal LAD MI approach induced larger infarct sizes (14.2 ± 3.2% vs. 10.6 ± 1.9%, P = 0.03), depressed systolic function (LV ejection fraction; 39.8 ± 7.5% vs. 54.1 ± 4.6%, P < 0.001), and more LV remodeling (end-systolic volume index; 82 ± 25 ml/m(2) vs. 51 ± 18 ml/m(2), P = 0.02, LAD vs. LCx, respectively) compared with the LCx MI approach without compromising the survival rate. At the papillary muscle level, echocardiographic strain analysis revealed no differences in radial and circumferential strain between LAD and LCx MIs. However, in contrast with the LCx MI, the LAD MI resulted in significantly decreased longitudinal strain. The proximal LAD MI model induces more LV remodeling and depressed LV function relative to the LCx MI model. Location of MI significantly impacts the severity of HF, thus careful consideration is required when choosing an MI model for preclinical HF studies.