» Articles » PMID: 25217611

Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): Modifying the CONSORT Statement†‡

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2014 Sep 14
PMID 25217611
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical trials testing infertility treatments often do not report on the major outcomes of interest to patients and clinicians and the public (such as live birth) nor on the harms, including maternal risks during pregnancy and fetal anomalies. This is complicated by the multiple participants in infertility trials which may include a woman (mother), a man (father), and result in a third individual if successful, their offspring (child), who is also the desired outcome of treatment. The primary outcome of interest and many adverse events occur after cessation of infertility treatment and during pregnancy and the puerperium, which create a unique burden of follow-up for clinical trial investigators and participants. In 2013, because of the inconsistencies in trial reporting and the unique aspects of infertility trials not adequately addressed by existing Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statements, we convened a consensus conference in Harbin, China, with the aim of planning modifications to the CONSORT checklist to improve the quality of reporting of clinical trials testing infertility treatment. The consensus group recommended that the preferred primary outcome of all infertility trials is live birth (defined as any delivery of a live infant ≥20 weeks gestations) or cumulative live birth, defined as the live birth per women over a defined time period (or number of treatment cycles). In addition, harms to all participants should be systematically collected and reported, including during the intervention, any resulting pregnancy, and during the neonatal period. Routine information should be collected and reported on both male and female participants in the trial. We propose to track the change in quality that these guidelines may produce in published trials testing infertility treatments. Our ultimate goal is to increase the transparency of benefits and risks of infertility treatments to provide better medical care to affected individuals and couples.

Citing Articles

The clinical effectiveness of the Mind/Body Program for Infertility on wellbeing and assisted reproduction outcomes: a randomized controlled trial in search for active ingredients.

Szigeti F J, Kazinczi C, Szabo G, Sipos M, Ujma P, Purebl G Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(8):1735-1751.

PMID: 38852061 PMC: 11291950. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae119.


PRO-FIT-CARE study: the feasibility assessment of a pilot online exercise intervention for persons living with obesity and female infertility.

Wadden K, Hollohan N, Furneaux T, Maher R, Barrett C, Fuller D Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1332376.

PMID: 38774277 PMC: 11107087. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1332376.


Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Ngwenya O, Lensen S, Vail A, Mol B, Broekmans F, Wilkinson J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD012693.

PMID: 38174816 PMC: 10765476. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012693.pub3.


Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement.

Phillips W, Sturgiss E, Glasziou P, Olde Hartman T, Orkin A, Prathivadi P Ann Fam Med. 2023; 21(6):549-555.

PMID: 37788942 PMC: 10681700. DOI: 10.1370/afm.3029.


TEAS, DHEA, CoQ10, and GH for poor ovarian response undergoing IVF-ET: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Zhu F, Yin S, Yang B, Li S, Feng X, Wang T Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023; 21(1):64.

PMID: 37464357 PMC: 10355041. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01119-0.


References
1.
Min J, Breheny S, MacLachlan V, Healy D . What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2003; 19(1):3-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh028. View

2.
Vandorsten J, Dodson W, Espeland M, Grobman W, Guise J, Mercer B . NIH consensus development conference: diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2013; 29(1):1-31. View

3.
Battaglia F, LUBCHENCO L . A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967; 71(2):159-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(67)80066-0. View

4.
Schlaff W . Barriers to conducting clinical research in reproductive medicine around the world. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(4):801. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.048. View

5.
Spong C . Defining "term" pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining "Term" Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA. 2013; 309(23):2445-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.6235. View