» Articles » PMID: 25217242

The Role of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Sagittal Balance Correction and Spinal Deformity

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Sep 14
PMID 25217242
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The recent proliferation of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) techniques has drawn attention to potential for these techniques to control or correct sagittal misalignment in adult spinal deformity. We systemically reviewed published studies related to LLIF use in adult spinal deformity treatment with emphasis on radiographic assessment of sagittal balance.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to examine studies focusing on sagittal balance restoration in adult degenerative scoliosis with the LLIF approach.

Results: Fourteen publications, 12 retrospective and 2 prospective, reported data regarding lumbar lordosis correction (1,266 levels in 476 patients) but only two measured global sagittal alignment.

Conclusion: LLIF appears to be especially effective when the lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance correction goals are less than 10° and 5 cm, respectively. However, the review demonstrated a lack of consistent reporting on sagittal balance restoration with the MIS LLIF techniques.

Citing Articles

Additional dorsal interspinous stabilisation has no advantage after decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Cebulla J, Staub L, Barz T Brain Spine. 2025; 5():104166.

PMID: 39810925 PMC: 11732073. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104166.


Advances and Evolving Challenges in Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Patel R, Yearley A, Isaac H, Chalif E, Chalif J, Zaidi H J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37835030 PMC: 10573859. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196386.


Importance of Surgical Order for Minimizing Vascular Injury During the L5-S1 Approach in Multilevel Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Jang J, Ko M, Lee Y, Park S, Wui S Korean J Neurotrauma. 2022; 18(2):287-295.

PMID: 36381430 PMC: 9634293. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e42.


Radiological and Clinical Outcomes comparing 2-level MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Chong E, Tong Tan L, Chong C, Yeo W, Koh D, Jiang L Global Spine J. 2022; 14(3):986-997.

PMID: 36202133 PMC: 11192119. DOI: 10.1177/21925682221132745.


Prevalence and location of endplate fracture and subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Inoue G, Saito W, Miyagi M, Imura T, Shirasawa E, Ikeda S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):880.

PMID: 34649548 PMC: 8518321. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04769-6.


References
1.
Cho K, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Berra A, Baldus C . Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(18):2030-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179085.92998.ee. View

2.
Youssef J, McAfee P, Patty C, Raley E, DeBauche S, Shucosky E . Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(26 Suppl):S302-11. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023438. View

3.
Wang M, Mummaneni P . Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 28(3):E9. DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09286. View

4.
Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H . Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(1):40-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000117542.88865.77. View

5.
Castro C, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Marchi L, Pimenta L . Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 472(6):1776-83. PMC: 4016469. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3263-5. View