» Articles » PMID: 25215265

Physical Activity and Social Cognitive Theory Outcomes of an Internet-Enhanced Physical Activity Intervention for African American Female College Students

Overview
Date 2014 Sep 13
PMID 25215265
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: African American women report low levels of physical activity (PA) and are disproportionately burdened by related chronic diseases. This pilot study tested a 6-month theory-based (Social Cognitive Theory, SCT) culturally-relevant website intervention to promote PA among African American female college students.

Materials And Methods: A single group pre-post test design (n=34) was used. PA and associated SCT constructs (outcome expectations, enjoyment, self-regulation, social support) were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.

Results: The sample was comprised of mostly obese ( BMI= 35.4, =6.82) young adults ( age= 21.21 years, =2.31). Fifty percent of the sample completed all assessments. Intent-to-treat analyses showed that participants reported a significant median improvement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from 82.5 minutes/week (=81.76, =76.23) at baseline to 115.0 minutes/week (122.44, =97.93) at 3 months (2.39=.02). However these gains appear to have attenuated by 6 months (Median= 82.5 minutes/week, =96.73, =84.20; 1.02, =.31). Significant increases from baseline to 6 months were found in self-regulation for PA .02 and social support for PA from friends (=.02). Changes in the SCT variables were not significantly associated with changes in PA; however, this may have been due to small sample size.

Conclusions: Future studies with larger samples and more aggressive retention strategies (e.g., more frequent incentives, prompts for website use) are needed to further explore the applicability of web-based approaches to promote PA in this at-risk population.

Citing Articles

Promoting Physical Activity Among Health Professional Students, Faculty, and Staff Members: A Competition-Based Intervention.

Zou C, Hollingsworth J, Farrell R, Fox B Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276241279170.

PMID: 39554954 PMC: 11562360. DOI: 10.1177/15598276241279170.


A focus group study among insufficiently physically active African American adults regarding technology-delivered team-based gamification for physical activity promotion.

Monroe C, Zosel K, Stansbury M, Younginer N, Davis R, Dutton G Mhealth. 2024; 10:3.

PMID: 38323152 PMC: 10839515. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-44.


Attitudes, Barriers, and Motivators Toward Daily Walking and a Mobile App to Increase Walking Among Women: Web-Based Anonymous Survey.

Jones C, Chandarana S, Vyas A, Napolitano M JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e48668.

PMID: 38319695 PMC: 10879972. DOI: 10.2196/48668.


Adapting MultiPLe behavior Interventions that eFfectively Improve (AMPLIFI) cancer survivor health: program project protocols for remote lifestyle intervention and assessment in 3 inter-related randomized controlled trials among survivors of....

Pekmezi D, Fontaine K, Rogers L, Pisu M, Martin M, Schoenberger-Godwin Y BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):471.

PMID: 35488238 PMC: 9051494. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09519-y.


Usage of Digital Health Tools and Perception of mHealth Intervention for Physical Activity and Sleep in Black Women.

Liao Y, Brown K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3).

PMID: 35162579 PMC: 8834665. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031557.


References
1.
Anderson E, Winett R, Wojcik J, Williams D . Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the guide-to-health trial. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15(1):21-32. DOI: 10.1177/1359105309342297. View

2.
Pekmezi D, Williams D, Dunsiger S, Jennings E, Lewis B, Jakicic J . Feasibility of using computer-tailored and internet-based interventions to promote physical activity in underserved populations. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(4):498-503. PMC: 2998032. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0135. View

3.
Marcus B, Williams D, Dubbert P, Sallis J, King A, Yancey A . Physical activity intervention studies: what we know and what we need to know: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on.... Circulation. 2006; 114(24):2739-52. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.179683. View

4.
Anderson E, Wojcik J, Winett R, Williams D . Social-cognitive determinants of physical activity: the influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation among participants in a church-based health promotion study. Health Psychol. 2006; 25(4):510-20. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.510. View

5.
Sallis J, Haskell W, Wood P, Fortmann S, Rogers T, Blair S . Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121(1):91-106. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113987. View