» Articles » PMID: 25212384

A Review of Doppler Ultrasound Quality Assurance Protocols and Test Devices

Overview
Journal Phys Med
Date 2014 Sep 13
PMID 25212384
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, an overview of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance (QA) testing will be presented in three sections. The first section will review the different Doppler ultrasound parameters recommended by professional bodies for use in QA protocols. The second section will include an evaluation and critique of the main test devices used to assess Doppler performance, while the final section of this paper will discuss which of the wide range of test devices have been found to be most suitable for inclusion in Doppler QA programmes. Pulsed Wave Spectral Doppler, Colour Doppler Imaging QA test protocols have been recommended over the years by various professional bodies, including the UK's Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM), the American Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). However, despite the existence of such recommended test protocols, very few commercial or research test devices exist which can measure the full range of both PW Doppler ultrasound and colour Doppler imaging performance parameters, particularly quality control measurements such as: (i) Doppler sensitivity (ii) colour Doppler spatial resolution (iii) colour Doppler temporal resolution (iv) colour Doppler velocity resolution (v) clutter filter performance and (vi) tissue movement artefact suppression. In this review, the merits of the various commercial and research test devices will be considered and a summary of results obtained from published studies which have made use of some of these Doppler test devices, such as the flow, string, rotating and belt phantom, will be presented.

Citing Articles

Comparative Approach to Performance Estimation of Pulsed Wave Doppler Equipment Based on Kiviat Diagram.

Fiori G, Scorza A, Schmid M, Conforto S, Sciuto S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409530 PMC: 11479340. DOI: 10.3390/s24196491.


A Comparative Study on a Novel Quality Assessment Protocol Based on Image Analysis Methods for Color Doppler Ultrasound Diagnostic Systems.

Fiori G, Pica A, Sciuto S, Marinozzi F, Bini F, Scorza A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24).

PMID: 36560240 PMC: 9783207. DOI: 10.3390/s22249868.


Projection-based stereolithography for direct 3D printing of heterogeneous ultrasound phantoms.

Paulsen S, Mitcham T, Pan C, Long J, Grigoryan B, Sazer D PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0260737.

PMID: 34882719 PMC: 8659365. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260737.


A Review of Carotid Artery Phantoms for Doppler Ultrasound Applications.

Dakok K, Matjafri M, Suardi N, Oglat A, Nabasu S J Med Ultrasound. 2021; 29(3):157-166.

PMID: 34729323 PMC: 8515632. DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_164_20.


Compatibility and Validation of a Recent Developed Artificial Blood through the Vascular Phantom Using Doppler Ultrasound Color- and Motion-mode Techniques.

Alshipli M, Sayah M, Oglat A J Med Ultrasound. 2021; 28(4):219-224.

PMID: 33659160 PMC: 7869744. DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_116_19.