» Articles » PMID: 25210153

Joint Cross-correlation Analysis Reveals Complex, Time-dependent Functional Relationship Between Cortical Neurons and Arm Electromyograms

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2014 Sep 12
PMID 25210153
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Correlation between cortical activity and electromyographic (EMG) activity of limb muscles has long been a subject of neurophysiological studies, especially in terms of corticospinal connectivity. Interest in this issue has recently increased due to the development of brain-machine interfaces with output signals that mimic muscle force. For this study, three monkeys were implanted with multielectrode arrays in multiple cortical areas. One monkey performed self-timed touch pad presses, whereas the other two executed arm reaching movements. We analyzed the dynamic relationship between cortical neuronal activity and arm EMGs using a joint cross-correlation (JCC) analysis that evaluated trial-by-trial correlation as a function of time intervals within a trial. JCCs revealed transient correlations between the EMGs of multiple muscles and neural activity in motor, premotor and somatosensory cortical areas. Matching results were obtained using spike-triggered averages corrected by subtracting trial-shuffled data. Compared with spike-triggered averages, JCCs more readily revealed dynamic changes in cortico-EMG correlations. JCCs showed that correlation peaks often sharpened around movement times and broadened during delay intervals. Furthermore, JCC patterns were directionally selective for the arm-reaching task. We propose that such highly dynamic, task-dependent and distributed relationships between cortical activity and EMGs should be taken into consideration for future brain-machine interfaces that generate EMG-like signals.

Citing Articles

Coupling Effects of Cross-Corticomuscular Association during Object Manipulation Tasks on Different Haptic Sensations.

Guerrero-Mendez C, Blanco-Diaz C, Rivera-Flor H, De Souza A, Jaramillo-Isaza S, Ruiz-Olaya A NeuroSci. 2024; 4(3):195-210.

PMID: 39483199 PMC: 11523752. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci4030018.


Analysis of neuronal ensemble activity reveals the pitfalls and shortcomings of rotation dynamics.

Lebedev M, Ossadtchi A, Mill N, Urpi N, Cervera M, Nicolelis M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18978.

PMID: 31831758 PMC: 6908571. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54760-4.


Commentary: Cortical activity in the null space: permitting preparation without movement.

Lebedev M Front Neurosci. 2018; 11:502.

PMID: 29503605 PMC: 5820534. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00502.


Intracortical Brain-Machine Interfaces Advance Sensorimotor Neuroscience.

Schroeder K, Chestek C Front Neurosci. 2016; 10:291.

PMID: 27445663 PMC: 4923184. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00291.


Interareal Spike-Train Correlations of Anterior Cingulate and Dorsal Prefrontal Cortex during Attention Shifts.

Oemisch M, Westendorff S, Everling S, Womelsdorf T J Neurosci. 2015; 35(38):13076-89.

PMID: 26400938 PMC: 6605436. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1262-15.2015.

References
1.
Fetz E, Cheney P . Functional relations between primate motor cortex cells and muscles: fixed and flexible. Ciba Found Symp. 1987; 132:98-117. DOI: 10.1002/9780470513545.ch7. View

2.
Schieber M, Rivlis G . Partial reconstruction of muscle activity from a pruned network of diverse motor cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 97(1):70-82. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00544.2006. View

3.
Nicolelis M, Lebedev M . Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(7):530-40. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2653. View

4.
Morrow M, Miller L . Prediction of muscle activity by populations of sequentially recorded primary motor cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(4):2279-88. PMC: 2586069. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00632.2002. View

5.
Fitzsimmons N, Lebedev M, Peikon I, Nicolelis M . Extracting kinematic parameters for monkey bipedal walking from cortical neuronal ensemble activity. Front Integr Neurosci. 2009; 3:3. PMC: 2659168. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.07.003.2009. View