» Articles » PMID: 25207402

Two-dimensional in Vivo Dose Verification Using Portal Imaging and Correlation Ratios

Overview
Date 2014 Sep 11
PMID 25207402
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) has the potential to be used for in vivo dosimetry during radiation therapy as an additional dose delivery check. In this study we have extended a method developed by A. Piermattei and colleagues in 2006 that made use of EPID transit images (acquired during treatment) to calculate dose in the isocenter point. The extension allows calculation of two-dimensional dose maps of the entire radiation field at the depth of isocenter. We quantified the variability of the ratio of EPID signal to dose in the isocenter plane in Solid Water phantoms of various thicknesses and with various field sizes, and designed a field edge dose calculation correction. To validate the method, we designed three realistic conventional radiation therapy treatment plans on a thorax and head anthropomorphic phantom (whole brain, brain primary, lung tumor). Using CT data, EPID transit images, EPID signal-to-dose correlation, and our edge correction, we calculated dose in the isocenter plane and compared it with the treatment planning system's prediction. Gamma evaluation (3%, 3 mm) showed good agreement (Pγ<1 ≥ 96.5%) for all fields of the whole brain and brain primary plans. In the presence of lung, however, our algorithm overestimated dose by 7%-9%. This 2D EPID-based in vivo dosimetry method can be used for posttreatment dose verification, thereby improving the safety and quality of patient treatments. With future work, it may be extended to measure dose in real time and to prevent harmful delivery errors.

Citing Articles

A novel approach to SBRT patient quality assurance using EPID-based real-time transit dosimetry : A step to QA with in vivo EPID dosimetry.

Moustakis C, Ebrahimi Tazehmahalleh F, Elsayad K, Fezeu F, Scobioala S Strahlenther Onkol. 2020; 196(2):182-192.

PMID: 31925465 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01549-z.


The Influence of Acquisition Mode on the Dosimetric Performance of an Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device.

Bawazeer O, Herath S, Sarasanandarajah S, Kron T, Deb P J Med Phys. 2017; 42(2):90-95.

PMID: 28706355 PMC: 5496276. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_98_16.


A Simple Method for 2-D In Vivo Dosimetry by Portal Imaging.

Peca S, Brown D, Smith W Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 16(6):944-955.

PMID: 28585491 PMC: 5762053. DOI: 10.1177/1533034617711354.


Portal Imaging Dosimetry Identifies Delivery Errors in Rectal Cancer Radiotherapy on the Belly Board Device.

Peca S, Sinha R, Brown D, Smith W Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 16(6):956-963.

PMID: 28585490 PMC: 5762054. DOI: 10.1177/1533034617711519.


Accuracy of automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in cone-beam computed tomography for tube current-exposure time product.

Won H, Chung J, Choi B, Park J, Hwang D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016; 17(6):421-428.

PMID: 27929513 PMC: 5690535. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6402.


References
1.
Jung J, Kim J, Yeo I, Cho Y, Kim S, DiBiase S . Fast transit portal dosimetry using density-scaled layer modeling of aSi-based electronic portal imaging device and Monte Carlo method. Med Phys. 2012; 39(12):7593-602. DOI: 10.1118/1.4764563. View

2.
Rowshanfarzad P, Sabet M, OConnor D, McCowan P, McCurdy B, Greer P . Gantry angle determination during arc IMRT: evaluation of a simple EPID-based technique and two commercial inclinometers. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012; 13(6):3981. PMC: 5718546. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3981. View

3.
Asuni G, Van Beek T, Venkataraman S, Popescu I, McCurdy B . A Monte Carlo tool for evaluating VMAT and DIMRT treatment deliveries including planar detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(11):3535-50. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/3535. View

4.
Williams M . Radiotherapy near misses, incidents and errors: radiotherapy incident at Glasgow. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007; 19(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2006.12.004. View

5.
Chytyk K, McCurdy B . Comprehensive fluence model for absolute portal dose image prediction. Med Phys. 2009; 36(4):1389-98. DOI: 10.1118/1.3083583. View