» Articles » PMID: 25201070

Infertility Care and the Introduction of New Reproductive Technologies in Poor Resource Settings

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Sep 10
PMID 25201070
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The overall prevalence of infertility was estimated to be 3.5-16.7% in developing countries and 6.9-9.3% in developed countries. Furthermore, according to reports from some regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence rate is 30-40%. The consequences of infertility and how it affects the lives of women in poor-resource settings, particularly in developing countries, has become an important issue to be discussed in reproductive health. In some societies, the inability to fulfill the desire to have children makes life difficult for the infertile couple. In many regions, infertility is considered a tragedy that affects not only the infertile couple or woman, but the entire family.

Methods: This is a position paper which encompasses a review of the needs of low-income infertile couples, mainly those living in developing countries, regarding access to infertility care, including ART and initiatives to provide ART at low or affordable cost. Information was gathered from the databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL, POPLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and ICTRP with the key words: infertility, low income, assisted reproductive technologies, affordable cost, low cost.

Results: There are few initiatives geared toward implementing ART procedures at low cost or at least at affordable cost in low-income populations. Nevertheless, from recent studies, possibilities have emerged for new low-cost initiatives that can help millions of couples to achieve the desire of having a biological child.

Conclusions: It is necessary for healthcare professionals and policymakers to take into account these new initiatives in order to implement ART in resource-constrained settings.

Citing Articles

From Choice to Justice: Disrupting the Binary Political Logics of Assisted Reproduction.

Mayers L Health Hum Rights. 2025; 26(2):13-24.

PMID: 39742206 PMC: 11683579.


The landscape of assisted reproductive technology access in India.

Tholeti P, Uppangala S, Kalthur G, Adiga S Reprod Fertil. 2024; .

PMID: 39401134 PMC: 11558918. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-24-0079.


Policy action points and approaches to promote fertility care in The Gambia: Findings from a mixed-methods study.

Afferri A, Dierickx S, Bittaye M, Marena M, Pacey A, Balen J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301700.

PMID: 38743724 PMC: 11093356. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301700.


Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature.

Fauser B, Adamson G, Boivin J, Chambers G, De Geyter C, Dyer S Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 30(2):153-173.

PMID: 38197291 PMC: 10905510. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad028.


A decennial cross-sectional review of assisted reproductive technology in a Tertiary Hospital in Southwest Nigeria.

Ottun T, Adewunmi A, Jinadu F, Olumodeji A, Akinlusi F, Rabiu K BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):680.

PMID: 37730568 PMC: 10510187. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05964-0.


References
1.
Vassard D, Lund R, Pinborg A, Boivin J, Schmidt L . The impact of social relations among men and women in fertility treatment on the decision to terminate treatment. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(12):3502-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des353. View

2.
Leke R, Oduma J, Bacha A, Grigor K . Regional and geographical variations in infertility: effects of environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic factors. Environ Health Perspect. 1993; 101 Suppl 2:73-80. PMC: 1519926. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s273. View

3.
Greil A . Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 45(11):1679-704. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00102-0. View

4.
Okonofua F . The case against new reproductive technologies in developing countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103(10):957-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09542.x. View

5.
Vayena E, Peterson H, Adamson D, Nygren K . Assisted reproductive technologies in developing countries: are we caring yet?. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(2):413-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.011. View