» Articles » PMID: 25194726

The Role of Elective Para-aortic Lymph Node Irradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Sep 8
PMID 25194726
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Pelvic lymph node positivity in cervical cancer is known to be an adverse prognostic factor and is associated with an elevated risk of clinically occult para-aortic lymph node metastases. The purpose of this study was to examine the benefit of elective para-aortic lymph node radiotherapy (PART) in patients with no clinical or radiographic evidence of para-aortic lymph node metastases receiving concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy.

Materials And Methods: Patients treated with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin for cervical cancer from 1999 to 2009 were identified in two prospective databases. All patients received external beam pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) to a median dose of 50 Gy concurrently with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2). This was followed by pulse dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy to a median dose of 40 Gy. Patients at high risk of occult para-aortic metastases also received PART to a median dose of 40 Gy.

Results: There were 228 patients suitable for analysis; the median follow-up was 4.6 years. The addition of PART to PRT was not associated with a significant difference in disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.1, confidence interval 0.7-1.8, P = 0.75) or overall survival (hazard ratio 1.6, confidence interval 0.9-2.7, P = 0.11) on multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of para-aortic relapse with PART versus PRT (hazard ratio 2.01, confidence interval 0.79-5.12, P = 0.14). The 3 year grade 3-4 late toxicities were 11% for the PART group versus 8% for PRT (hazard ratio 1.39, confidence interval 0.58-3.37, P = 0.47).

Conclusions: These results suggest that cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin do not benefit from elective PART.

Citing Articles

Current Paradigm and Future Directions in the Management of Nodal Disease in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Cheung E, Wu P Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39857985 PMC: 11764200. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020202.


A Novel Risk Factor for Para-Aortic Lymph Node Recurrence After Definite Pelvic Radiotherapy in Stage IIIB Cervical Cancer.

Zhang G, Wang C, Ma C, Miao L, He F, Fu C Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 21:15330338221141541.

PMID: 36426576 PMC: 9703487. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221141541.


The impact of para-aortic lymph node irradiation on disease-free survival in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bukkems L, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, van der Leij F, Peters M, Gerestein C, Zweemer R Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022; 35:97-103.

PMID: 35669003 PMC: 9166370. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.05.006.


Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Horikawa N, Horie A, Kawahara S, Sunada M, Chigusa Y, Yamaguchi K JSLS. 2022; 26(1).

PMID: 35444399 PMC: 8993461. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00096.


Extended field or pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of post-surgery multiple pelvic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients: a randomized, multi-center phase II clinical trial.

Luo W, Li Y, Ke G, Wu X, Huang X Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 10(1):361-371.

PMID: 35116266 PMC: 8798010. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-2573.