» Articles » PMID: 25192584

Nutrition Interventions at Point-of-sale to Encourage Healthier Food Purchasing: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Sep 7
PMID 25192584
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Point-of-sale is a potentially important opportunity to promote healthy eating through nutrition education and environment modification. The aim of this review was to describe and review the evidence of effectiveness of various types of interventions that have been used at point-of-sale to encourage purchase and/or eating of healthier food and to improve health outcomes, and the extent to which effectiveness was related to intensity, duration and intervention setting.

Methods: Records from searches in databases were screened and assessed against inclusion criteria. Included studies had risk of bias assessed. Intervention effectiveness was assessed for two outcomes: i) purchase and/or intake of healthier food options and/or nutrient intake; and ii) mediating factors that might effect the primary outcome.

Results: The search identified 5635 references. Thirty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies had low risk of bias and were classified as strong, nine were moderate and 11 were weak. Six intervention types and a range of different outcome measures were described in these papers: i) nutrition education and promotion alone through supermarkets/stores; ii) nutrition education plus enhanced availability of healthy food; iii) monetary incentive alone; iv) nutrition education plus monetary incentives; v) nutrition intervention through vending machines; and vi) nutrition intervention through shopping online. The evidence of this review indicates that monetary incentives offered to customers for a short-term look promising in increasing purchase of healthier food options when the intervention is applied by itself in stores or supermarkets. There was a lack of good quality studies addressing all other types of relevant point-of-sale interventions examining change in purchase and/or intake of healthier food options. There were few studies that examined mediating factors that might mediate the effect on the primary outcomes of relevant interventions.

Conclusions: A range of intervention types have been used at point-of-sale to encourage healthy purchasing and/or intake of healthier food options and to improve health outcomes. There is a need for more well designed studies on the effectiveness of a range of point-of-sale interventions to encourage healthier eating and improve health outcomes, and of the mediating factors that might impact these interventions.

Citing Articles

Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review.

Jostock C, Forde H, Roberts N, Jebb S, Pechey R, Bandy L Public Health Nutr. 2025; 28(1):e24.

PMID: 39783012 PMC: 11822606. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980025000035.


High street retail environment interventions and their theorised impacts on health and wellbeing: A scoping review.

Rinaldi C, McGill E, Petticrew M, Knai C, Egan M PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312826.

PMID: 39541394 PMC: 11563429. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312826.


Are food and beverage purchases reflective of dietary intake? Validity of supermarket purchases as indicator of diet quality in the Supreme Nudge Trial.

Colizzi C, Stuber J, van der Schouw Y, Beulens J Br J Nutr. 2024; 132(10):1394-1402.

PMID: 39501842 PMC: 11646671. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524002630.


A cross-sectional study of the relative availability and prominence of shelf space allocated to healthy and unhealthy foods in supermarkets in urban Ireland, by area-level deprivation.

OMahony S, Collins N, Doyle G, McCann A, Burke K, Moore A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2689.

PMID: 39358707 PMC: 11445997. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19671-8.


Strategies associated with improved healthiness of consumer purchasing in supermarket interventions: a systematic overview of reviews and evaluation of primary articles.

Brooker P, Howlett C, Brindal E, Hendrie G Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1334324.

PMID: 38983251 PMC: 11232481. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334324.


References
1.
Anderson E, Winett R, Wojcik J, Winett S, Bowden T . A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers. Ann Behav Med. 2001; 23(2):88-100. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_3. View

2.
Scarborough P, Nnoaham K, Clarke D, Capewell S, Rayner M . Modelling the impact of a healthy diet on cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010; 66(5):420-6. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.114520. View

3.
Fiske A, Cullen K . Effects of promotional materials on vending sales of low-fat items in teachers' lounges. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104(1):90-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.10.011. View

4.
Bandura A . Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:1-26. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. View

5.
French S, Jeffery R, Story M, Breitlow K, BAXTER J, Hannan P . Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: the CHIPS Study. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(1):112-7. PMC: 1446491. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.112. View