» Articles » PMID: 25184209

A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: a Cross Sectional Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Sep 4
PMID 25184209
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia.

Methods: In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286).

Results: The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%.

Conclusion: Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool.

Citing Articles

Regression without regrets -initial data analysis is a prerequisite for multivariable regression.

Heinze G, Baillie M, Lusa L, Sauerbrei W, Schmidt C, Harrell F BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):178.

PMID: 39117997 PMC: 11308558. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02294-3.


Antimicrobial resistance prevalence in bloodstream infection in 29 European countries by age and sex: An observational study.

Waterlow N, Cooper B, Robotham J, Knight G PLoS Med. 2024; 21(3):e1004301.

PMID: 38484006 PMC: 10939247. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004301.


A Simple Bacteremia Score for Predicting Bacteremia in Patients with Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department: A Cohort Study.

Han H, Kim D, Kim M, Heo S, Chang H, Tak Lee G J Pers Med. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38248758 PMC: 10817606. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010057.


Predicting Bacteremia among Septic Patients Based on ED Information by Machine Learning Methods: A Comparative Study.

Goh V, Chou Y, Lee C, Ma M, Wang W, Lin C Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36292187 PMC: 9600599. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102498.


Diagnosing hospital bacteraemia in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine using electronic health records and machine learning classifiers.

Garnica O, Gomez D, Ramos V, Hidalgo J, Ruiz-Giardin J EPMA J. 2021; 12(3):365-381.

PMID: 34484472 PMC: 8405861. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-021-00252-3.


References
1.
Jaimes F, Arango C, Ruiz G, Cuervo J, Botero J, Velez G . Predicting bacteremia at the bedside. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38(3):357-62. DOI: 10.1086/380967. View

2.
Alahmadi Y, Aldeyab M, McElnay J, Scott M, Darwish Elhajji F, Magee F . Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect. 2011; 77(3):233-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.033. View

3.
Laupland K . Defining the epidemiology of bloodstream infections: the 'gold standard' of population-based assessment. Epidemiol Infect. 2012; 141(10):2149-57. PMC: 9151395. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268812002725. View

4.
Hanley J, McNeil B . A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983; 148(3):839-43. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. View

5.
Akobeng A . Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96(5):644-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00178.x. View