» Articles » PMID: 25183162

Postural Adjustment Errors During Lateral Step Initiation in Older and Younger Adults

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Sep 4
PMID 25183162
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose was to examine age differences and varying levels of step response inhibition on the performance of a voluntary lateral step initiation task. Seventy older adults (70-94 years) and twenty younger adults (21-58 years) performed visually cued step initiation conditions based on direction and spatial location of arrows, ranging from a simple choice reaction time task to a perceptual inhibition task that included incongruous cues about which direction to step (e.g., a left pointing arrow appearing on the right side of a monitor). Evidence of postural adjustment errors and step latencies were recorded from vertical ground reaction forces exerted by the stepping leg. Compared with younger adults, older adults demonstrated greater variability in step behavior, generated more postural adjustment errors during conditions requiring inhibition, and had greater step initiation latencies that increased more than younger adults as the inhibition requirements of the condition became greater. Step task performance was related to clinical balance test performance more than executive function task performance.

Citing Articles

Keeping in step with the young: Chronometric and kinematic data show intact procedural locomotor sequence learning in older adults.

Johannsen L, Friedgen E, Stephan D, Batista J, Schulze D, Laurentius T PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0266733.

PMID: 35503784 PMC: 9064075. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266733.


Effects of ageing on responses to stepping-target displacements during walking.

Zhang Y, Smeets J, Brenner E, Verschueren S, Duysens J Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020; 121(1):127-140.

PMID: 32995959 PMC: 7815571. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04504-4.


A new paradigm to study the influence of attentional load on cortical activity for motor preparation of step initiation.

Braquet A, Bayot M, Tard C, Defebvre L, Derambure P, Dujardin K Exp Brain Res. 2020; 238(3):643-656.

PMID: 32025766 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05739-5.


Online adjustments of leg movements in healthy young and old.

Potocanac Z, Duysens J Exp Brain Res. 2017; 235(8):2329-2348.

PMID: 28478576 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4967-7.


Adaptation of sensorimotor coupling in postural control is impaired by sleep deprivation.

Aguiar S, Barela J PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0122340.

PMID: 25799560 PMC: 4370556. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122340.

References
1.
Uemura K, Oya T, Uchiyama Y . Effects of visual interference on initial motor program errors and execution times in the choice step reaction. Gait Posture. 2012; 38(1):68-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.016. View

2.
Germain S, Collette F . Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibitory processes in young and elderly participants using the Simon task. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008; 14(6):1014-21. DOI: 10.1017/S135561770808123X. View

3.
Melzer I, Kurz I, Shahar D, Oddsson L . Do voluntary step reactions in dual task conditions have an added value over single task for fall prediction? A prospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011; 22(5-6):360-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF03324940. View

4.
Miyake A, Friedman N, Emerson M, Witzki A, Howerter A, Wager T . The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000; 41(1):49-100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. View

5.
Sternberg S . The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: some misconceptions. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:744. PMC: 3798011. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00744. View