» Articles » PMID: 25178986

Domain-general and Domain-specific Functional Networks in Working Memory

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Sep 3
PMID 25178986
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a latent cognitive structure that serves to store and manipulate a limited amount of information over a short time period. How information is maintained in WM remains a debated issue: it is unclear whether stimuli from different sensory domains are maintained under distinct mechanisms or maintained under the same mechanism. Previous neuroimaging research on this issue to date has focused on individual brain regions and has not provided a comprehensive view of the functional networks underlying multi-domain WM. To study the functional networks involved in visual and auditory WM, we applied constrained principal component analysis (CPCA) to a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset acquired when participants performed a change-detection task requiring them to remember only visual, only auditory, or both visual and auditory stimuli. Analysis revealed evidence of both [1] domain-specific networks responsive to either visual or auditory WM (but not both), and [2] domain-general networks responsive to both visual and auditory WM. The domain-specific networks showed load-dependent activations during only encoding, whereas a domain-general network was sensitive to WM load across encoding, maintenance, and retrieval. The latter domain-general network likely reflected attentional processes involved in WM encoding, retrieval, and possibly maintenance as well. These results do not support the domain-specific account of WM maintenance but instead favor the domain-general theory that items from different sensory domains are maintained under the same mechanism.

Citing Articles

Iranian 6-11 years age population-based EEG, ERP, and cognition dataset.

Nazari M, Abbasi S, Rezaeian M, Heysieattalab S, Safakheil H, Nasrabadi A Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):319.

PMID: 39987138 PMC: 11846862. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04624-6.


Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Rizza A, Pedale T, Mastroberardino S, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Van der Lubbe R, Spence C Brain Sci. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38391698 PMC: 10886761. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14020123.


CHANGES IN FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY FOLLOWING INTENSIVE ATTENTION TRAINING IN PATIENTS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY. A PILOT STUDY.

Persson H, Li T, Markovic G J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2024; 7:12436.

PMID: 38264065 PMC: 10802785. DOI: 10.2340/jrmcc.v7.12436.


Neuromorphic learning, working memory, and metaplasticity in nanowire networks.

Loeffler A, Diaz-Alvarez A, Zhu R, Ganesh N, Shine J, Nakayama T Sci Adv. 2023; 9(16):eadg3289.

PMID: 37083527 PMC: 10121165. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adg3289.


Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View.

Guler K, Aydin A Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2022; 12(3):131-149.

PMID: 36465839 PMC: 9710454. DOI: 10.1159/000526226.


References
1.
Van Essen D, Drury H, Dickson J, Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson C . An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8(5):443-59. PMC: 131042. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080443. View

2.
Todd J, Marois R . Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 2004; 428(6984):751-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature02466. View

3.
Edin F, Klingberg T, Johansson P, McNab F, Tegner J, Compte A . Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(16):6802-7. PMC: 2672558. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901894106. View

4.
Kim J, Jung W, Kang D, Park J, Jang J, Choi J . Changes in effective connectivity according to working memory load: an FMRI study of face and location working memory tasks. Psychiatry Investig. 2012; 9(3):283-92. PMC: 3440479. DOI: 10.4306/pi.2012.9.3.283. View

5.
Metzak P, Feredoes E, Takane Y, Wang L, Weinstein S, Cairo T . Constrained principal component analysis reveals functionally connected load-dependent networks involved in multiple stages of working memory. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010; 32(6):856-71. PMC: 6870062. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21072. View